Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Improving Translational Accuracy

Improving Translational Accuracy

Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...

Improving Translational Accuracy

Improving Translational Accuracy

Survival Tree

Survival Tree

Survival trees are a non-parametric method used in survival analysis to model the relationship between a set of covariates and the time until an event of interest occurs, often referred to as the "time-to-event" or "survival time." This method is particularly useful when dealing with censored data, where the event has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period, or when the exact time of the event is unknown.
Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...

Prediction Intervals

Prediction Intervals

The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.

Ranks

Ranks

Unlike parametric methods, nonparametric statistics are ideal for nominal and ordinal data, requiring fewer assumptions about the population's nature or distribution. This makes nonparametric methods easier to apply and interpret, as they do not depend on parameters like mean or standard deviation. One common approach in nonparametric analysis is to sort data according to a specific criterion. For instance, we might arrange weather data from hottest to coldest days in a month or rank cities...

Inductive Reasoning

Inductive Reasoning

Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Functional Integrative Bayesian Analysis of High-dimensional Multiplatform Clinicogenomic Data.

Journal of the American Statistical Association·2026

Same author

Thioredoxin interacting protein (TXNIP), a redox regulator, mediates the RAPGEF3/4 signaling dependency in primary melanoma.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same author

SatTCR: a pipeline for performing saturation analysis of the T cell receptor repertoire and a case study of a healthy canine.

MethodsX·2025

Same author

Discovery and Targeted Proteomic Studies Reveal Striatal Markers Validated for Huntington's Disease.

Annals of clinical and translational neurology·2025

Same author

Impact of <i>SPOP</i> Mutations on Clinical Outcomes in Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

JCO precision oncology·2025

Same author

Genomic alterations and associated outcomes in patients with PSMA-positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with 177Lu-PSMA-617.

The oncologist·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 15, 2026

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Published on: December 6, 2024

Making the cut: improved ranking and selection for large-scale inference.

Nicholas C Henderson¹, Michael A Newton²

¹Department of Statistics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA.

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical Methodology

|August 30, 2016

Summary

This study introduces a new empirical Bayesian ranking method for identifying top measurement units in large datasets. It improves accuracy by balancing measurement error and effect magnitude, outperforming existing approaches.

Keywords:

empirical Bayes posterior expected rank r-value

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 15, 2026

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Published on: December 6, 2024

Area of Science:

Statistical Inference
Data Analysis
Machine Learning

Background:

Identifying leading measurement units is crucial for large-scale inference across various domains.
Traditional testing approaches overemphasize low measurement error, while maximum likelihood (ML) methods favor high measurement error.
Existing Bayesian methods often use specialized loss functions leading to similar deficiencies in unit selection.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop and evaluate a generic empirical Bayesian ranking procedure for identifying top measurement units.
To maximize the expected overlap between true and reported top unit lists across all list sizes.
To address the deficiencies of existing methods in handling measurement error and effect magnitude.

Main Methods:

A novel empirical Bayesian ranking procedure is described and evaluated.
The method utilizes unit-specific posterior upper tail probabilities and their empirical distribution to create a ranking variable.
It compares the operating characteristics against popular non-ML methods and existing Bayesian approaches.

Main Results:

The proposed empirical Bayesian procedure effectively populates lists of top units by maximizing true positive overlap.
It discounts high-variance units less compared to popular non-ML methods, leading to improved performance.
The method demonstrates superior operating characteristics in the considered statistical models.

Conclusions:

The developed empirical Bayesian ranking procedure offers a more balanced and accurate approach to identifying leading measurement units.
This method mitigates the biases associated with measurement error inherent in other common techniques.
It provides improved statistical inference for large-scale data analysis tasks.