Cost-Effectiveness of Sacubitril-Valsartan in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 15, 2026

Reduction in Left Ventricular Wall Stress and Improvement in Function in Failing Hearts using Algisyl-LVR
Published on: April 8, 2013
Alexander T Sandhu1, Daniel A Ollendorf1, Richard H Chapman1
1From Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California; Center for Health Policy and Center for Primary Care and Outcomes Research, Stanford University, and Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; and Institute for Clinical and Economic Review, Boston, Massachusetts.
Insights
Sacubitril-valsartan therapy offers reasonable value for managing heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, reducing hospitalizations and improving life-years gained. This treatment provides significant benefits for patients with NYHA class II to IV heart failure.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Health Economics
- Pharmacoeconomics
Background:
- Sacubitril-valsartan therapy demonstrably reduces cardiovascular mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction compared to enalapril.
- Chronic heart failure (HF) management remains a significant clinical and economic challenge.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of sacubitril-valsartan compared to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) therapy for patients with chronic heart failure.
- Evaluate the long-term value of sacubitril-valsartan in a real-world or simulated patient population.
Main Methods:
- A Markov decision model was employed to simulate patient outcomes over a lifetime horizon.
- Data sources included clinical trials, observational studies, Medicare reimbursement data, drug pricing, and mortality tables.
- The target population comprised patients aged 64 years with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II-IV heart failure and ejection fraction ≤0.40.
Main Results:
- Sacubitril-valsartan resulted in 0.62 additional quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and 0.69 additional life-years at an incremental cost of $29,203, yielding a cost per QALY of $47,053.
- Cost-effectiveness varied by NYHA class: $44,531/QALY for class II and $58,194/QALY for class III/IV.
- Sensitivity analysis indicated treatment duration was the most influential factor, with a cost per QALY of $120,623 if benefits were limited to the trial duration (27 months).
Conclusions:
- Sacubitril-valsartan therapy represents a reasonable value for improving cardiovascular outcomes in patients with NYHA class II-IV heart failure.
- The study's findings are based on data from a single clinical trial, highlighting a key limitation.
- Further research may be needed to confirm long-term benefits and cost-effectiveness across diverse patient populations.
Background:
Sacubitril-valsartan therapy reduces cardiovascular mortality compared with enalapril therapy in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.
Objective:
To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of sacubitril-valsartan versus angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy in patients with chronic heart failure.
Design:
Markov decision model.
Data Sources:
Clinical trials, observational analyses, reimbursement data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, drug pricing databases, and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention life tables.
Target Population:
Patients at an average age of 64 years, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II to IV heart failure, and left ventricular ejection fraction of 0.40 or less.
Time Horizon:
Lifetime.
Perspective:
Societal.
Intervention:
Treatment with sacubitril-valsartan or lisinopril.
Outcome Measures:
Life-years, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), costs, heart failure hospitalizations, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios.
Results Of Base-Case Analysis:
The sacubitril-valsartan group experienced 0.08 fewer heart failure hospitalization, 0.69 additional life-year, 0.62 additional QALY, and $29 203 in incremental costs, equating to a cost per QALY gained of $47 053. The cost per QALY gained was $44 531 in patients with NYHA class II heart failure and $58 194 in those with class III or IV heart failure.
Results Of Sensitivity Analysis:
Sacubitril-valsartan treatment was most sensitive to the duration of improved outcomes, with a cost per QALY gained of $120 623 if the duration was limited to the length of the trial (median, 27 months). No variations in other parameters caused the cost to exceed $100 000 per QALY gained.
Limitation:
The benefit of sacubitril-valsartan is based on a single clinical trial.
Conclusion:
Treatment with sacubitril-valsartan provides reasonable value in reducing cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in patients with NYHA class II to IV heart failure.
Primary Funding Source:
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and Institute for Clinical and Economic Review.
More Related Videos
12:45Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
07:41Insertion, Maintenance, and Removal of the Percutaneous Dual Lumen Cannula Right Ventricular Assist Device
Published on: July 20, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology