Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

353
Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...
353
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

9.2K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
9.2K
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

365
Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
365
Blinding01:11

Blinding

4.0K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
4.0K
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

688
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
688
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

4.5K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Changes in Toddler Diet Quality Between 12 and 24 Months Using the HEI-Toddlers-2020: A Secondary Analysis of a Prospective Cohort.

Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics·2026
Same author

Consensus Definitions of Disease Activity and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy.

Neurology·2026
Same author

Relation between Time from Onset to Randomization and Benefit Magnitude in Recent Clinical Trials of Thrombectomy for Patients with Large Ischemic Cores.

Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology·2026
Same author

Near-Real-Time Clinical Trial Accrual Dashboard in a National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Center: Mixed Methods Implementation Study.

JMIR medical informatics·2026
Same author

Outcomes of Double-Hit and Single High-Risk Cytogenetic Newly Diagnosed Myeloma in Transplant-Eligible Patients.

Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)·2026
Same author

Optimizing rare neurological disease trials: Bayesian frameworks and hierarchical models for improved efficiency in clinical trial design.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Treatment of genitourinary syndrome of menopause with fractional COâ‚‚ laser versus fractional microablative radiofrequency: study protocol for a double-blind, randomised, non-inferiority trial.

Trials·2026
Same journal

TaILOR: a randomised trial to compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a patient-initiated follow-up (PIFU) strategy compared to standard care pathways in people with inflammatory arthritis: a study protocol.

Trials·2026
Same journal

Scaling up community-based non-communicable disease research into practice in Pokhara Metropolitan City of Nepal (SCALE-NCD) trial: study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Trials·2026
Same journal

EECP intervention and coronary flow reserve in chronic coronary syndrome: a protocol of a multicentre, randomised controlled study in China (ECP-Core Trial).

Trials·2026
Same journal

Impact of early tracheostomy in infratentorial lesions trial: rationale and design.

Trials·2026
Same journal

Efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation for post-stroke urinary incontinence: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Trials·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 15, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.4K

A Bayesian comparative effectiveness trial in action: developing a platform for multisite study adaptive

Alexandra R Brown1, Byron J Gajewski2, Lauren S Aaronson3

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, University of Kansas Medical Center, Mail Stop 1026, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA. abrown8@kumc.edu.

Trials
|September 1, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study details a Bayesian Adaptive Design (BAD) for efficient clinical trials, demonstrating a novel process for response-adaptive randomization in comparative effectiveness research.

Keywords:
Adaptive randomizationBayesian adaptive designBayesian randomizationClinical trial conductData captureREDCapResponse-adaptive randomization

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.3K
A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
04:53

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

11.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 15, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.4K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.3K
A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
04:53

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

11.4K

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials Methodology
  • Biostatistics
  • Comparative Effectiveness Research

Background:

  • Bayesian methods are increasingly used in clinical trials, with a significant rise in publications since 1990.
  • Existing literature offers examples of Bayesian Adaptive Designs (BAD) but lacks detailed procedural guidance.
  • This paper addresses this gap by outlining the BAD process used in a specific comparative effectiveness trial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a detailed walkthrough of conducting a Bayesian Adaptive Design (BAD).
  • To demonstrate the application of BAD in a multisite comparative effectiveness trial.
  • To offer a generalizable model for future clinical trials utilizing adaptive randomization.

Main Methods:

  • Employed a Bayesian Adaptive Design (BAD) for enhanced efficiency and potentially smaller sample sizes.
  • Utilized response-adaptive randomization to allocate participants to more effective treatments faster.
  • Developed an in-house computation software for response-adaptive randomization, integrated with an internet-based electronic data capture tool.

Main Results:

  • A process was established for adapting randomization with minimal disruption to study sites.
  • New randomization tables could be generated rapidly and integrated seamlessly into the data capture tool.

Conclusions:

  • This manuscript is the first to detail the technical process of evaluating a multisite comparative effectiveness trial using adaptive randomization.
  • Bayesian trials, particularly using adaptive randomization, present a valuable opportunity for comparative effectiveness research.
  • The presented case study serves as a model for future clinical trials combining statistical software and web-based applications.