Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 15, 2026

Arthroscopic Management of Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: Whole Rotator Cable Reconstruction Using Proximal Biceps Tendon Autograft
Published on: June 6, 2025
Long head BIceps TEnodesis or tenotomy in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: BITE study protocol
Derek Friedrich Petrus van Deurzen1, Vanessa Antoinet Bernice Scholtes2, Nienke Willemien Willigenburg2
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Joint Research, OLVG, Oosterpark 9, 1090 HM, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. d.vandeurzen@olvg.nl.
This randomized controlled trial compares long head of the biceps (LHB) tenotomy versus tenodesis during rotator cuff repair. The study aims to determine the optimal surgical approach for LHB tendon lesions to improve shoulder function.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Sports Medicine
- Shoulder Arthroscopy
Background:
- The optimal management of the diseased long head of the biceps (LHB) tendon during rotator cuff repair is debated.
- Existing meta-analyses show no significant difference in strength or functional outcomes between tenotomy and tenodesis, but often lack high-quality evidence.
- There is a need for robust evidence to guide surgical decisions for LHB tendon pathology in conjunction with rotator cuff repair.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare functional outcomes between LHB tenotomy and LHB tenodesis when performed as an adjunct to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
- To provide strong evidence to support clinical decision-making regarding LHB tendon management.
- To evaluate various clinical and patient-reported outcomes, including shoulder function, pain, and cosmetic appearance.
Main Methods:
- A randomized controlled trial involving patients over 50 years old with specific rotator cuff tears and LHB pathology.
- Patients were randomized to undergo either LHB tenotomy or LHB tenodesis.
- Outcomes including Constant score, Oxford Shoulder Test, DASH, "Popeye" deformity, elbow flexion strength, and pain were assessed pre-operatively and at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 1 year post-surgery.
Main Results:
- This section is not available in the provided abstract.
- Further analysis of collected data is required to determine the primary and secondary outcomes.
- The study is powered to detect non-inferiority between the two surgical techniques.
Conclusions:
- This study will contribute valuable evidence regarding the risks and benefits of LHB tenotomy versus tenodesis in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair.
- The findings will aid in managing patient expectations and optimizing surgical treatment strategies for combined LHB and rotator cuff pathology.
- Further research is needed to solidify best practices in managing the long head of the biceps tendon during rotator cuff surgery.
More Related Videos
07:10Modified Long Head of Biceps Tendon Rerouting and Fixation as Partial Capsular Reconstruction for Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears
Published on: March 6, 2026
05:25Knotless Independent Double-Row Repair and Biceps Augmentation for Anterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears
Published on: January 23, 2026