Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2026

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
Published on: May 13, 2022
The case against the case against group studies
E B Zurif1, H Gardner, H H Brownell
1Brandeis University, Boston, MA.
Abstract:
We challenge the position that only the analysis of single patients can allow us to infer normal function from impaired performance. We claim that the focus on group vs. single case studies is unprofitable and that a more useful question is how best to form abstractions of relevance to cognitive theory. In this context, we consider issues concerning the category of "agrammatism."
More Related Videos
08:12A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
Published on: March 1, 2022
13:20Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
Published on: December 5, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Case Studies
Group Design
Statistical Significance
In- and Out-Groups
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Impact of Groups on Groups