Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 15, 2026

A Modified Sonographic Algorithm for Image Acquisition in Life-Threatening Emergencies in the Critically Ill Newborn
Published on: April 7, 2023
Manchester Triage System: main flowcharts, discriminators and outcomes of a pediatric emergency care
Camila Amthauer1, Maria Luzia Chollopetz da Cunha2
1RN, MSc.
Insights
The Manchester Triage System is effective in pediatric emergency care, with "worried parents" and "recent events" being key indicators. This system helps manage patient flow and outcomes, including hospitalizations and observation periods.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Emergency Medicine
- Healthcare Management
- Triage Systems
Background:
- The Manchester Triage System (MTS) is a widely used tool for prioritizing patients in emergency departments.
- Characterizing its application in pediatric settings is crucial for optimizing care delivery.
- Understanding patient demographics and triage patterns informs resource allocation and quality improvement initiatives.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the characteristics of care services provided through risk rating using the Manchester Triage System in a pediatric emergency setting.
- To identify demographic factors, primary triage flowcharts, discriminators, and patient outcomes.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of the MTS in managing pediatric emergency care.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional quantitative study was conducted.
- Data were collected from computerized medical records of patients treated in the pediatric emergency over one year.
- Descriptive statistics, including absolute and relative frequencies, were used for data analysis.
Main Results:
- A total of 10,921 visits were analyzed, with a majority of patients being male (54.4%) and aged between 29 days and two years (44.5%).
- The urgent risk category was most prevalent (43.6%).
- The primary triage flowchart was 'worried parents' (22.4%), and the most common discriminator was 'recent event' (15.3%). Hospitalization occurred in 10.4% of cases, while 61.8% required observation.
Conclusions:
- 'Worried parents' and 'recent events' were identified as significant factors in the pediatric emergency triage process.
- These indicators influenced hospitalization rates and the need for extended observation periods.
- The findings highlight the importance of these discriminators in the Manchester Triage System for managing pediatric emergency care outcomes.
Objetive:
to characterize the care services performed through risk rating by the Manchester Triage System, identifying demographics (age, gender), main flowcharts, discriminators and outcomes in pediatric emergency.
Method:
cross-sectional quantitative study. Data on risk classification were obtained through a search of computerized registration data from medical records of patients treated in the pediatric emergency within one year. Descriptive statistics with absolute and relative frequencies was used for the analysis.
Results:
10,921 visits were conducted in the pediatric emergency, mostly male (54.4%), aged between 29 days and two years (44.5%). There was a prevalence of the urgent risk category (43.6%). The main flowchart used in the care was worried parents (22.4%) and the most prevalent discriminator was recent event (15.3%). The hospitalization outcome occurred in 10.4% of care performed in the pediatric emergency, however 61.8% of care needed to stay under observation and / or being under the health team care in the pediatric emergency.
Conclusion:
worried parents was the main flowchart used and recent events the most prevalent discriminator, comprising the hospitalization outcomes and permanency in observation in the pediatric emergency before discharge from the hospital.
Related Concept Videos
Flow Sheet
Here's a closer look at the examples of flowsheets commonly used by nurses:
Graphic Sheet Documentation:
Tertiary Healthcare System
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Discharge Summary Forms
Here's a detailed look at the key components and guidelines for preparing a discharge summary:
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Flail Chest-II
Assessment:
1. Clinical Evaluation:
History:

