Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Variability: Analysis01:11

Variability: Analysis

613
Measures of variability are statistical metrics that reveal the dispersion pattern within a dataset. They are pivotal in biostatistics, providing insights into the heterogeneity within health and biological data. Variability signifies the degree to which data points diverge from one another, helping researchers understand the potential range of values and associated uncertainty within the data.
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
613
Variance01:15

Variance

13.1K
The deviations show how spread out the data are about the mean. A positive deviation occurs when the data value exceeds the mean, whereas a negative deviation occurs when the data value is less than the mean. If the deviations are added, the sum is always zero. So one cannot simply add the deviations to get the data spread. By squaring the deviations, the numbers are made positive; thus, their sum will also be positive.
The standard deviation measures the spread in the same units as the data....
13.1K
Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: ANOVA01:12

Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: ANOVA

1.9K
Analysis of Variance, or ANOVA, is a powerful statistical technique used to analyze parametric data, primarily in research and experimental studies. It's designed to compare the means of two or more groups, assisting researchers in identifying any significant differences between these group means. There are two main types of ANOVA based on the complexity of the analysis: one-way and two-way.
One-way ANOVA is applied when a single independent variable or factor is scrutinized. It compares...
1.9K
Variation01:19

Variation

8.3K
An important characteristic of any set of data is the variation in the data. In some data sets, the data values are concentrated closely near the mean; in other data sets, the data values are more widely spread out from the mean. The most common measure of variation, or spread, is the standard deviation, which is the square root of variance.
When independent and dependent variables are plotted on a scatter plot, the slope of a line is a value that describes the rate of change between the two...
8.3K
Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

811
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
811
Standard Deviation of Calculated Results01:14

Standard Deviation of Calculated Results

8.9K
Standard deviation measures the spread of data around the mean value. Many large data sets follow a Gaussian distribution, also known as a normal distribution. This distribution is bell-shaped curved, with the most frequently observed value (mean or central value) in the middle. The farther away from the central value, the greater the deviation from the central value, and the lower the frequency.
A broad Gaussian distribution curve has a wider standard deviation, representing a data set with...
8.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Long-term results of dynamic tumor-tracking stereotactic body radiotherapy with real-time monitoring using a gimbal-mounted linac for liver tumors: a multicenter observational study.

International journal of clinical oncology·2025
Same author

Multi-Institutional Phase II Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Dynamic Tumor-Tracking, Moderately Hypofractionated Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.

Cancer medicine·2025
Same author

Prospective external validation of radiomics-based predictive model of distant metastasis after dynamic tumor tracking stereotactic body radiation therapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: A multi-institutional analysis.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2024
Same author

Population-based asymmetric margins for moving targets in real-time tumor tracking.

Medical physics·2023
Same author

Dynamic tumor-tracking stereotactic body radiotherapy with real-time monitoring of liver tumors using a gimbal-mounted linac: A multi-institutional phase II study.

Clinical and translational radiation oncology·2023
Same author

Organs-at-risk dose constraints in head and neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy using a dataset from a multi-institutional clinical trial (JCOG1015A1).

Radiation oncology (London, England)·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 15, 2026

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation
10:33

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation

Published on: September 4, 2017

16.7K

Technical Note: Introduction of variance component analysis to setup error analysis in radiotherapy.

Yukinori Matsuo1, Mitsuhiro Nakamura1, Takashi Mizowaki1

  • 1Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-applied Therapy, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin-Kawaharacho, Sakyo, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.

Medical Physics
|September 3, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Variance component analysis offers a new method for estimating setup errors in radiotherapy. This approach provides more accurate systematic and random error assessments compared to conventional techniques.

More Related Videos

Radiation Planning Assistant - A Streamlined, Fully Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System
08:25

Radiation Planning Assistant - A Streamlined, Fully Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System

Published on: April 11, 2018

16.1K
Voluntary Breath-hold Technique for Reducing Heart Dose in Left Breast Radiotherapy
11:38

Voluntary Breath-hold Technique for Reducing Heart Dose in Left Breast Radiotherapy

Published on: July 3, 2014

47.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 15, 2026

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation
10:33

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation

Published on: September 4, 2017

16.7K
Radiation Planning Assistant - A Streamlined, Fully Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System
08:25

Radiation Planning Assistant - A Streamlined, Fully Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System

Published on: April 11, 2018

16.1K
Voluntary Breath-hold Technique for Reducing Heart Dose in Left Breast Radiotherapy
11:38

Voluntary Breath-hold Technique for Reducing Heart Dose in Left Breast Radiotherapy

Published on: July 3, 2014

47.6K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Statistical Analysis

Background:

  • Accurate radiotherapy requires precise patient setup.
  • Setup errors have systematic and random components that impact treatment accuracy.
  • Traditional methods for estimating these errors may have limitations, particularly in hypofractionated treatments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce variance component analysis for estimating systematic and random setup errors in radiotherapy.
  • To compare variance component analysis with conventional methods for setup error estimation.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a one-factor random effect model with balanced data.
  • Applied analysis-of-variance (ANOVA)-based computation to estimate error components and confidence intervals (CIs).

Main Results:

  • ANOVA-based estimation provided values and CIs for systematic and random setup errors.
  • The conventional method was found to overestimate systematic error, especially in hypofractionated settings.
  • Confidence intervals for systematic error were wider than those for random error.

Conclusions:

  • Variance component analysis presents a robust method for analyzing radiotherapy setup errors.
  • This technique offers potential for novel applications in quantifying and understanding setup error components.
  • The ANOVA-based method can be extended to multifactor models for more comprehensive error analysis.