Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 15, 2026

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills
Published on: April 23, 2014
The inter-rater reliability of the Risk Instrument for Screening in the Community
Elizabeth Weathers1, Rónán O'Caoimh2, Ronan O'Sullivan3
1Clinical Research Nurse, Centre for Gerontology and Rehabilitation, University College Cork, St Finbarrs Hospital and the Health Research Board Clinical Research Facility Galway, National University of Ireland, Galway City, Ireland.
Abstract:
Predicting risk of adverse healthcare outcomes is important to enable targeted delivery of interventions. The Risk Instrument for Screening in the Community (RISC), designed for use by public health nurses (PHNs), measures the 1-year risk of hospitalisation, institutionalisation and death in community-dwelling older adults according to a five-point global risk score: from low (score 1,2) to medium (3) to high (4,5). We examined the inter-rater reliability (IRR) of the RISC between student PHNs (n=32) and expert raters using six cases (two low, medium and high-risk), scored before and after RISC training. Correlations increased for each adverse outcome, statistically significantly for institutionalisation (r=0.72 to 0.80, p=0.04) and hospitalisation (r=0.51 to 0.71, p<0.01) but not death. Training improved accuracy for low-risk but not all high-risk cases. Overall, the RISC showed good IRR, which increased after RISC training. That reliability fell for some high-risk cases suggests that the training programme requires adjustment to improve IRR further.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Relative Risk
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Reliability and Validity
Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot

