Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 15, 2026

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Quantification of Pulmonary Perfusion using Calibrated Arterial Spin Labeling
Published on: May 30, 2011
Time-efficient measurement of multi-phase arterial spin labeling MR signal in white matter
1Department of Radiology, C. J. Gorter Center for High-Field MRI, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. x.zhang.radi@gmail.com.
Abstract:
White matter (WM) perfusion has great potential as a physiological biomarker in many neurological diseases. Although it has been demonstrated previously that arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance imaging (ASL-MRI) enables the detection of the perfusion-weighted signal in most voxels in WM, studies of cerebral blood flow (CBF) in WM by ASL-MRI are relatively scarce because of its particular challenges, such as significantly lower perfusion and longer arterial transit times relative to gray matter (GM). Recently, ASL with a spectroscopic readout has been proposed to enhance the sensitivity for the measurement of WM perfusion. However, this approach suffers from long acquisition times, especially when acquiring multi-phase ASL datasets to improve CBF quantification. Furthermore, the potential increase in the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) by spectroscopic readout compared with echo planar imaging (EPI) readout has not been proven experimentally. In this study, we propose the use of time-encoded pseudo-continuous ASL (te-pCASL) with single-voxel point-resolved spectroscopy (PRESS) readout to quantify WM cerebral perfusion in a more time-efficient manner. Results are compared with te-pCASL with a conventional EPI readout for both WM and GM perfusion measurements. Perfusion measurements by te-pCASL PRESS and conventional EPI showed no significant difference for quantitative WM CBF values (Student's t-test, p = 0.19) or temporal SNR (p = 0.33 and p = 0.81 for GM and WM, respectively), whereas GM CBF values (p = 0.016) were higher using PRESS than EPI readout. WM CBF values were found to be 18.2 ± 7.6 mL/100 g/min (PRESS) and 12.5 ± 5.5 mL/100 g/min (EPI), whereas GM CBF values were found to be 77.1 ± 11.2 mL/100 g/min (PRESS) and 53.6 ± 9.6 mL/100 g/min (EPI). This study demonstrates the feasibility of te-pCASL PRESS for the quantification of WM perfusion changes in a highly time-efficient manner, but it does not result in improved temporal SNR, as does traditional te-pCASL EPI, which remains the preferred option because of its flexibility in use.
Insights
Time-encoded pseudo-continuous ASL with PRESS readout offers efficient white matter (WM) perfusion quantification. Conventional EPI readout remains preferred for WM perfusion due to flexibility, despite similar WM CBF values.
Area of Science:
- Neuroimaging
- Biomarkers
- Neurological Diseases
Background:
- White matter (WM) perfusion is a potential biomarker for neurological diseases.
- Arterial spin labeling MRI (ASL-MRI) faces challenges in WM due to low perfusion and long transit times.
- Spectroscopic ASL enhances WM perfusion sensitivity but increases acquisition time.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate time-encoded pseudo-continuous ASL (te-pCASL) with PRESS readout for time-efficient WM perfusion quantification.
- To compare WM and gray matter (GM) perfusion measurements using te-pCASL with PRESS versus conventional EPI readout.
Main Methods:
- Utilized time-encoded pseudo-continuous ASL (te-pCASL) with single-voxel point-resolved spectroscopy (PRESS) readout.
- Acquired multi-phase ASL datasets for cerebral blood flow (CBF) quantification.
- Compared WM and GM perfusion measurements against conventional echo planar imaging (EPI) readout.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in quantitative WM CBF values (p=0.19) or temporal SNR between PRESS and EPI readouts.
- GM CBF values were significantly higher with PRESS readout (p=0.016).
- WM CBF: 18.2±7.6 mL/100 g/min (PRESS) vs. 12.5±5.5 mL/100 g/min (EPI). GM CBF: 77.1±11.2 mL/100 g/min (PRESS) vs. 53.6±9.6 mL/100 g/min (EPI).
Conclusions:
- te-pCASL PRESS is feasible for time-efficient WM perfusion quantification.
- PRESS readout does not improve temporal SNR compared to EPI.
- Conventional te-pCASL EPI remains the preferred method for WM perfusion due to its flexibility.
More Related Videos
05:23Author Spotlight: Noninvasive Cerebral Blood Flow Determination in Human Functional Brain Region for Diagnosis of Neurological Disorders
Published on: May 31, 2024
09:59A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocol for Stroke Onset Time Estimation in Permanent Cerebral Ischemia
Published on: September 16, 2017