Phase I Study Evaluating WEE1 Inhibitor AZD1775 As Monotherapy and in Combination With Gemcitabine, Cisplatin, or
Suzanne Leijen1, Robin M J M van Geel1, Anna C Pavlick1
1Suzanne Leijen, Robin M.J.M. van Geel, and Jan H.M. Schellens, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; Jan H.M. Schellens, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Anna C. Pavlick, New York University Medical Center, New York, NY; Lee Rosen, University of California Los Angeles, Santa Monica, CA; Raymond Lam, Shelonitda Rose, Mark A. Lee, Tomoko Freshwater, and Stuart Shumway, Merck, Kenilworth, NJ; Geoffrey I. Shapiro, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Albiruni R. Abdul Razak and Amit M. Oza, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Raoul Tibes, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg; Tim Demuth, Sandoz AG, Holzkirchen, Germany; and Li Wen Liang, Merck Sharp & Dohme R&D, Beijing, China.
Abstract:
Purpose AZD1775 is a WEE1 kinase inhibitor targeting G2 checkpoint control, preferentially sensitizing TP53-deficient tumor cells to DNA damage. This phase I study evaluated safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of oral AZD1775 as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy in patients with refractory solid tumors. Patients and Methods In part 1, patients received a single dose of AZD1775 followed by 14 days of observation. In part 2, patients received AZD1775 as a single dose (part 2A) or as five twice per day doses or two once per day doses (part 2B) in combination with one of the following chemotherapy agents: gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m2), cisplatin (75 mg/m2), or carboplatin (area under the curve, 5 mg/mL⋅min). Skin biopsies were collected for pharmacodynamic assessments. TP53 status was determined retrospectively in archival tumor tissue. Results Two hundred two patients were enrolled onto the study, including nine patients in part 1, 43 in part 2A (including eight rollover patients from part 1), and 158 in part 2B. AZD1775 monotherapy given as single dose was well tolerated, and the maximum-tolerated dose was not reached. In the combination regimens, the most common adverse events consisted of fatigue, nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, and hematologic toxicity. The maximum-tolerated doses and biologically effective doses were established for each combination. Target engagement, as a predefined 50% pCDK1 reduction in surrogate tissue, was observed in combination with cisplatin and carboplatin. Of 176 patients evaluable for efficacy, 94 (53%) had stable disease as best response, and 17 (10%) achieved a partial response. The response rate in TP53-mutated patients (n = 19) was 21% compared with 12% in TP53 wild-type patients (n = 33). Conclusion AZD1775 was safe and tolerable as a single agent and in combination with chemotherapy at doses associated with target engagement.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Treatment Resistant Cancers


