Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Targeting STAT5A via CRISPR/Cas9 restores TKI sensitivity in resistant chronic myeloid leukemia cells.

Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England)·2026
Same author

Spatial Mapping of Genetic Liability to Psychiatric Disorders in the Adult Human Hippocampus.

Biological psychiatry global open science·2026
Same author

Lineage-specific transcriptomic signatures and therapeutic target discovery in myeloid and lymphoid leukemias.

Personalized medicine·2026
Same author

Chemosensitizing effect of apigenin on T-ALL cell therapy.

Frontiers in pharmacology·2025
Same author

LEP and FOXO1 genes, as a proposed tumor suppressor autophagic cell death related genes, can be targeted by antidiabetic therapy in nondiabetic breast cancer patients.

Discover oncology·2025
Same author

Functional combination of resveratrol and midostaurin induces cytotoxicity to overcome acquired midostaurin resistance in FLT3-ITD expressing acute myeloid leukemia cells.

Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 15, 2026

An Automated Differential Nuclear Staining Assay for Accurate Determination of Mitocan Cytotoxicity
07:58

An Automated Differential Nuclear Staining Assay for Accurate Determination of Mitocan Cytotoxicity

Published on: May 12, 2020

7.6K

Cell Proliferation and Cytotoxicity Assays.

Aysun Adan, Yağmur Kiraz, Yusuf Baran1

  • 1İzmir Institute of Technology, Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, İzmir, Turkey. ybaran@gmail.com.

Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology
|September 9, 2016
PubMed
Summary

This review compares cell viability and proliferation assays, crucial for drug screening and understanding cell survival mechanisms. It details various methods, aiding researchers in selecting the optimal assay for their specific needs.

More Related Videos

Real-time Cytotoxicity Assays in Human Whole Blood
08:27

Real-time Cytotoxicity Assays in Human Whole Blood

Published on: November 7, 2014

12.8K
Comparison of Three Different Methods for Determining Cell Proliferation in Breast Cancer Cell Lines
12:35

Comparison of Three Different Methods for Determining Cell Proliferation in Breast Cancer Cell Lines

Published on: September 3, 2016

20.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 15, 2026

An Automated Differential Nuclear Staining Assay for Accurate Determination of Mitocan Cytotoxicity
07:58

An Automated Differential Nuclear Staining Assay for Accurate Determination of Mitocan Cytotoxicity

Published on: May 12, 2020

7.6K
Real-time Cytotoxicity Assays in Human Whole Blood
08:27

Real-time Cytotoxicity Assays in Human Whole Blood

Published on: November 7, 2014

12.8K
Comparison of Three Different Methods for Determining Cell Proliferation in Breast Cancer Cell Lines
12:35

Comparison of Three Different Methods for Determining Cell Proliferation in Breast Cancer Cell Lines

Published on: September 3, 2016

20.2K

Area of Science:

  • Cell biology
  • Biochemistry
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Cell viability and proliferation are key indicators in biological research.
  • Assays for cell viability and proliferation are vital for drug screening and toxicological studies.
  • Understanding cell survival and death mechanisms requires accurate assessment of cell health.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a comprehensive overview of common cell proliferation and cytotoxicity assays.
  • To compare the advantages, disadvantages, methodologies, and intended purposes of various assays.
  • To guide researchers in selecting the most appropriate viability assay based on experimental context.

Main Methods:

  • Review of established cell viability and proliferation assay methodologies.
  • Categorization of assays based on underlying cellular functions (e.g., enzyme activity, membrane permeability, ATP production).
  • Inclusion of diverse assay types such as dye exclusion, metabolic activity, ATP, sulforhodamine B, protease markers, clonogenic survival, DNA synthesis, and Raman spectroscopy.

Main Results:

  • Multiple assay methods exist, each leveraging different cellular functions for assessment.
  • Assays can be broadly classified into categories like dye exclusion, metabolic activity, and ATP-based methods.
  • The choice of assay depends critically on cell type, culture conditions, and research questions.

Conclusions:

  • Accurate cell viability and proliferation assessment is fundamental across various biological disciplines.
  • A wide array of assays are available, necessitating careful consideration for optimal experimental design.
  • This review serves as a guide to navigate the selection of appropriate cell-based assays.