Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 15, 2026

Author Spotlight: Exploring Strategies for Successful Immune Response Against Tumors
Published on: August 16, 2024
Mitotic rate in primary melanoma: interobserver and intraobserver reliability, analyzed using H&E sections and
Claus Garbe1, Thomas K Eigentler2, Jürgen Bauer2
1Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany. claus.garbe@med.uni-tuebingen.de.
Background:
In 2009, the AJCC issued a revised melanoma staging system. In addition to tumor thickness and ulceration, the mitotic rate was introduced as the third major prognostic parameter for the classification of primary cutaneous melanoma. Given that, according to the 2009 AJCC classification, the detection of one or more dermal tumor mitoses leads to an upstaging - from stage Ia to Ib - of melanomas with a tumor thickness of ≤ 1.0 mm, we set out to investigate the reproducibility of this new parameter.
Methods:
In order to assess interobserver reliability, 17 dermatopathologists und pathologists - all well versed in the diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma - analyzed the mitotic rate in 15 thin primary cutaneous melanomas (mean tumor thickness 0.91 mm) using identical slides. Mitotic rates were determined on H&E and phosphohistone H3 (Ser10)-stained samples. Without knowledge of their previous assessment, five of the aforementioned examiners reevaluated the samples after more than one year in order to ascertain intraobserver reliability.
Results:
Interobserver reliability of the mitotic rate in thin primary melanomas is disappointing and independent of whether H&E or immunohistochemically stained samples are used (kappa value: 0.088 [H&E], 0.154 [IH], respectively). Kappa values improved to 0.345 (H&E) and 0.403 (IH) when using a cutoff of 0/1 vs. 2+ mitoses. Similarly unsatisfactory, kappa values for intraobserver reliability ranged from 0.18 and 0.348, depending on the individual examiner.
Discussion:
Given the unsatisfactory reproducibility and large variations in assessing the mitotic rate, it remains a matter of debate whether this diagnostic parameter should play a role in therapeutic decisions.

