Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

What is an ANOVA?01:16

What is an ANOVA?

10.8K
The Analysis of Variance or ANOVA is a statistical test developed by Ronald Fisher in 1918. It is performed on three or more samples to check for equality between their means.
Before performing ANOVA, one must ensure that the samples used for this analysis have three crucial characteristics or statistical assumptions. The first assumption states that the samples should be drawn from normally distributed samples, while the second requires that all the drawn samples should be randomly and...
10.8K
What is ANOVA?01:13

What is ANOVA?

6.9K
The Analysis of Variance or ANOVA is a statistical test developed by Ronald Fisher in 1918. It is performed on three or more samples to check for equality between their means.
Before performing ANOVA, one must ensure that the samples used for this analysis have three crucial characteristics or statistical assumptions. The first assumption states that the samples should be drawn from normally distributed samples, while the second requires that all the drawn samples be randomly and independently...
6.9K
Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: ANOVA01:12

Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: ANOVA

1.9K
Analysis of Variance, or ANOVA, is a powerful statistical technique used to analyze parametric data, primarily in research and experimental studies. It's designed to compare the means of two or more groups, assisting researchers in identifying any significant differences between these group means. There are two main types of ANOVA based on the complexity of the analysis: one-way and two-way.
One-way ANOVA is applied when a single independent variable or factor is scrutinized. It compares...
1.9K
One-Way ANOVA01:18

One-Way ANOVA

14.1K
One-way ANOVA analyzes more than three samples categorized by one factor. For example, it can compare the average mileage of sports bikes. Here, the data is categorized by one factor - the company. However, one-way ANOVA cannot be used to simultaneously compare the sample mean of three or more samples categorized by two factors. An example of two factors would be sports bikes from different companies driven in different terrains, such as a desert or snowy landscape. Here, two-way ANOVA is used...
14.1K
Two-Way ANOVA01:17

Two-Way ANOVA

3.5K
The two-way ANOVA is an extension of the one-way ANOVA. It is a statistical test performed on three or more samples categorized by two factors - a row factor and a column factor. Ronald Fischer mentioned it in 1925 in his book 'Statistical Methods for Researchers.'
The two-way ANOVA analysis initially begins by stating the null hypothesis that there is an interaction effect between the two factors of a dataset. This effect can be visualized using line segments formed by joining the...
3.5K
Multiple Regression01:25

Multiple Regression

4.3K
Multiple regression assesses a linear relationship between one response or dependent variable and two or more independent variables. It has many practical applications.
Farmers can use multiple regression to determine the crop yield based on more than one factor, such as water availability, fertilizer, soil properties, etc. Here, the crop yield is the response or dependent variable as it depends on the other independent variables. The analysis requires the construction of a scatter plot...
4.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Implications of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder diagnostic timing on mental health service utilisation in young adult females: A population-based record linkage cohort study.

JCPP advances·2026
Same author

Comparing the psychosocial impacts of COVID-19 in seven low- and middle-income countries: A cross-sectional study.

PLOS global public health·2026
Same author

Investigation Into the Effectiveness of Community Water Fluoridation and Dental Caries Experience in 4-Year-Old Aotearoa New Zealand Children: A National Repeated Cross-Sectional Study From 2010 to 2022.

Community dentistry and oral epidemiology·2026
Same author

Placebo analgesia persistence: evaluating behavioural stability in repeated trials.

Communications biology·2026
Same author

Associations between body mass index and body composition among Pacific adolescents in Aotearoa New Zealand.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Human brainstem activation underpinning offset analgesia changes in perceived pain intensity. An ultra-high field functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation.

NeuroImage·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 15, 2026

A User-friendly and Powerful R Analysis of Large-scale Datasets
10:56

A User-friendly and Powerful R Analysis of Large-scale Datasets

Published on: November 4, 2025

440

Detecting variable responses in time-series using repeated measures ANOVA: Application to physiologic challenges.

Paul M Macey1, Philip J Schluter2, Katherine E Macey3

  • 1UCLA School of Nursing, LA, CA, USA; Brain Research Institute, Department of Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, LA, CA, USA.

F1000Research
|September 13, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This article describes a statistical method for analyzing how physiological signals, such as brain activity or heart rate, change over time during a specific challenge. By using a technique that compares data points without needing to guess the shape of the response beforehand, researchers can identify complex patterns in data. The authors provide practical examples for implementing this approach using common statistical software.

Keywords:
functional magnetic resonance imagingmixed effect modelsphysiological responsesregression analysisstatistical modelsstatistical modelingtime-series analysisfMRI data processingphysiological monitoring

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

10.9K
A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
10:46

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data

Published on: December 9, 2015

11.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 15, 2026

A User-friendly and Powerful R Analysis of Large-scale Datasets
10:56

A User-friendly and Powerful R Analysis of Large-scale Datasets

Published on: November 4, 2025

440
Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

10.9K
A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
10:46

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data

Published on: December 9, 2015

11.2K

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical statistics and repeated measures ANOVA methodology
  • Neuroimaging and physiological signal processing research

Background:

No prior work had resolved the challenge of identifying temporal patterns in physiological data without relying on predefined models. Researchers often struggle to characterize complex signals that do not follow simple, expected trajectories during experimental tasks. This gap motivated the development of flexible statistical frameworks capable of capturing dynamic changes across multiple time points. Prior research has shown that standard approaches frequently require specific assumptions about the timing or shape of biological responses. That uncertainty drove the need for techniques that remain agnostic to the underlying structure of the observed data. It was already known that functional magnetic resonance imaging data often require specialized processing to extract meaningful trends from specific regions. This paper addresses these limitations by proposing a robust method for evaluating time-series data. The authors demonstrate how this strategy effectively handles diverse physiological recordings beyond traditional neuroimaging applications.

Purpose Of The Study:

The aim of this study is to present a flexible statistical approach for analyzing physiological time-series data recorded during experimental challenges. Researchers often face difficulties when attempting to characterize dynamic signals that lack a predictable timing or pattern. This work addresses the need for a method that compares means at each time point without relying on an a priori model. The authors seek to provide a robust alternative to existing techniques that may be too restrictive for complex biological responses. By leveraging repeated measures analysis of variance, the study intends to offer a versatile tool for various physiological signals. The motivation stems from the requirement to analyze functional magnetic resonance imaging volumes-of-interest alongside other continuous recordings like heart rate. The authors aim to illustrate practical implementations of this technique in widely used statistical software packages. Ultimately, the study provides a framework for detecting significant effects and group differences in diverse experimental paradigms.

Main Methods:

Review approach involves implementing a statistical framework to evaluate temporal trends in physiological signals during experimental tasks. The authors utilize functional magnetic resonance imaging volumes-of-interest to demonstrate the utility of their proposed methodology. Data processing begins with the extraction of signals from pre-processed images followed by the calculation of average intensity across the region. These values undergo scaling relative to baseline periods before the researchers bin the time points for analysis. The team provides specific instructions for executing the model using the PROC MIXED procedure within the SAS environment. Additionally, they detail an alternative implementation strategy using the lme function in the R statistical software package. Model diagnostics and the calculation of predicted means are performed using supplementary libraries to ensure robust results. This comprehensive approach allows for the systematic evaluation of within-group and between-group responses across the entire duration of the challenge.

Main Results:

Key findings from the literature indicate that the proposed approach effectively identifies significant overall effects in time-series data without requiring predefined models. The authors demonstrate the application of this technique using functional magnetic resonance imaging data from two distinct groups of subjects. Results show that the method successfully captures complex response patterns elicited during a respiratory challenge. The analysis provides clear insights into the timing of physiological responses relative to baseline periods. By comparing means at each time point, the researchers detect specific differences between groups that are not apparent through other methods. The implementation in SAS and R confirms that the model is computationally feasible for standard research datasets. This statistical strategy serves as a useful complement to whole-brain voxel-based assessments by focusing on specific regions of interest. The findings suggest that the method is highly adaptable for various physiological signals, including heart rate and pulse oximetry.

Conclusions:

The authors suggest that this statistical framework provides a flexible alternative for evaluating complex temporal dynamics in physiological data. Synthesis and implications indicate that the method successfully identifies significant effects without requiring rigid, predefined models of expected response timing. Researchers can utilize this approach to compare group differences at specific intervals relative to a baseline. The findings demonstrate that this technique serves as a valuable complement to whole-brain assessments in neuroimaging studies. Implementation in statistical software packages allows for broad accessibility and practical application across various research settings. The authors propose that the method is particularly well-suited for paradigms that elicit intricate or non-linear response patterns. By enabling post-hoc analysis of specific regions, the technique enhances the interpretability of complex experimental results. This work highlights the utility of repeated measures analysis for characterizing dynamic physiological changes during controlled challenges.

The researchers propose using repeated measures analysis of variance to compare mean signal intensities at each time point. This mechanism allows for the detection of significant overall effects and specific differences between groups without requiring an a priori model of the expected response pattern.

The authors utilize functional magnetic resonance imaging volumes-of-interest, heart rate, breathing rate, and pulse oximetry. These components allow the statistical approach to be applied across diverse physiological signals rather than being restricted to a single data modality.

The authors state that binning time points is necessary to manage the data structure effectively. This technical step allows for the calculation of average signal intensity across the region of interest during the scanning period, facilitating the subsequent statistical comparison.

The researchers employ the PROC MIXED procedure in SAS and the lme function in R. These software tools serve as the primary vehicle for implementing the mixed model approach, which is essential for handling the repeated measures structure of the data.

The authors measure signal intensity scaled relative to baseline periods. This measurement allows for the identification of within-group and between-group responses, providing a standardized way to evaluate changes during a respiratory challenge.

The researchers propose that this method is suited for physiologic testing paradigms eliciting complex response patterns. They claim it provides insight into the timing of responses and response differences between groups that might otherwise be missed.