Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 15, 2026
A Co-culture Method to Investigate the Crosstalk Between X-ray Irradiated Caco-2 Cells and PBMC
Published on: January 30, 2018
Cardiovascular medicine in Morgagni's De sedibus: dawn of cardiovascular pathology
Fabio Zampieri1, Alberto Zanatta1, Cristina Basso1
1Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padua Medical School, Padua, Italy.
Insights
Giovanni Battista Morgagni
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Anatomy
- Pathological Anatomy
- Medical History
Background:
- This study reviews significant cardiovascular observations from Morgagni's seminal 1761 work.
- The review categorizes findings according to current cardiac anatomical structures.
Discussion:
- Morgagni's interpretations integrated contemporary theories like blood circulation and iatromechanics.
- He emphasized empirical description and individual case specificity in pathological anatomy.
Key Insights:
- Cardiovascular findings are classified into aorta/pulmonary artery, pericardium, coronary arteries, myocardium, endocardium, congenital defects, and rhythm disorders.
- Morgagni's methodology involved systematic literature review and comparison of observations, a method still relevant today.
Outlook:
- This work highlights the enduring relevance of Morgagni's foundational contributions to cardiovascular pathology.
- It underscores the historical development of understanding heart diseases through anatomical correlation.
Abstract:
The most significant cardiovascular anatomoclinical observations from Morgagni's masterpiece De sedibus et causis morborum per anatomen indagatis (1761) are herein reported, divided into the current taxonomy according to cardiac structure: (a) aorta and pulmonary artery, (b) pericardium, (c) coronary arteries, (d) myocardium, (e) endocardium, (f) congenital heart defects, and (g) heart rhythm disorders. Morgagni's interpretations in cardiovascular pathology were strictly related with the most advanced theories of his time, such as those of blood circulation and iatromechanics; nevertheless, he remained close to the empirical description of clinical and pathological anatomy phenomena with their individual specificity. Through a systematic review of the literature, he compared the data from his own observations and experiments with those from physicians he considered reliable by applying the method of literature review which is still valid nowadays.