Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 15, 2026

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
Published on: October 11, 2018
Subgroup-Based Adaptive (SUBA) Designs for Multi-Arm Biomarker Trials
Yanxun Xu1, Lorenzo Trippa2, Peter Müller3
1Division of Statistics and Scientific Computing, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, U.S.A.
Abstract:
Targeted therapies based on biomarker profiling are becoming a mainstream direction of cancer research and treatment. Depending on the expression of specific prognostic biomarkers, targeted therapies assign different cancer drugs to subgroups of patients even if they are diagnosed with the same type of cancer by traditional means, such as tumor location. For example, Herceptin is only indicated for the subgroup of patients with HER2+ breast cancer, but not other types of breast cancer. However, subgroups like HER2+ breast cancer with effective targeted therapies are rare and most cancer drugs are still being applied to large patient populations that include many patients who might not respond or benefit. Also, the response to targeted agents in humans is usually unpredictable. To address these issues, we propose SUBA, subgroup-based adaptive designs that simultaneously search for prognostic subgroups and allocate patients adaptively to the best subgroup-specific treatments throughout the course of the trial. The main features of SUBA include the continuous reclassification of patient subgroups based on a random partition model and the adaptive allocation of patients to the best treatment arm based on posterior predictive probabilities. We compare the SUBA design with three alternative designs including equal randomization, outcome-adaptive randomization and a design based on a probit regression. In simulation studies we find that SUBA compares favorably against the alternatives.
Insights
Subgroup-based adaptive designs (SUBA) identify patient subgroups and adaptively assign treatments during clinical trials. This approach aims to improve targeted cancer therapy effectiveness by matching patients to optimal treatments within identified subgroups.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Biostatistics
- Clinical Trial Design
Background:
- Biomarker-driven targeted therapies are crucial in cancer research, but identifying responsive patient subgroups remains challenging.
- Current treatments often apply to broad patient populations, leading to unpredictable responses and limited efficacy for many.
- Effective targeted therapies for specific subgroups, like HER2+ breast cancer, are rare.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce Subgroup-Based Adaptive designs (SUBA) for simultaneously identifying prognostic subgroups and adaptively allocating patients to optimal treatments.
- To address the limitations of current targeted therapy approaches in clinical trials.
Main Methods:
- SUBA employs a random partition model for continuous patient subgroup reclassification.
- Adaptive patient allocation is based on posterior predictive probabilities to the best subgroup-specific treatment.
- The SUBA design was compared against equal randomization, outcome-adaptive randomization, and a probit regression design via simulation studies.
Main Results:
- Simulation studies indicated that SUBA performs favorably compared to alternative trial designs.
- SUBA demonstrated effectiveness in simultaneously identifying subgroups and optimizing treatment allocation.
Conclusions:
- Subgroup-Based Adaptive designs offer a promising approach to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of targeted cancer therapy clinical trials.
- SUBA has the potential to improve patient outcomes by ensuring more precise treatment assignments based on identified prognostic subgroups.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies
Group Design

