Compliance with USPSTF recommendations on aspirin for prevention of cardiovascular disease in men
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 15, 2026

The WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Srikrishna Varun Malayala1, Ambreen Raza2
1Department of Hospital Medicine, Jeanes Hospital, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Insights
Many men eligible for aspirin therapy to prevent heart disease were not prescribed it, and a significant portion of those who were prescribed it did not take it as recommended. Physician advice and patient adherence are key factors in aspirin compliance. This highlights potential challenges for updated guidelines.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular disease prevention
- Preventive medicine guidelines
- Pharmacological interventions
Background:
- The United States Preventive Services Taskforce (USPSTF) recommended aspirin (ASA) for men aged 45-79 years in 2009 to reduce coronary artery disease (CAD) risk.
- This recommendation balanced the benefits of CAD risk reduction against the harm of gastrointestinal hemorrhage.
- Evaluating compliance with these guidelines is crucial for effective public health implementation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess adherence to the 2009 USPSTF aspirin recommendations among eligible men.
- To identify factors influencing physician prescription decisions for aspirin.
- To determine factors affecting patient compliance with prescribed aspirin therapy.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional study utilizing the 2011-2012 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) dataset.
- Inclusion criteria: men aged 45-79 years with no prior history of CAD.
- Calculation of 10-year Framingham risk scores to determine aspirin eligibility; analysis of physician prescribing patterns and patient compliance.
Main Results:
- Approximately 91.5% of the study population qualified for aspirin therapy based on risk assessment.
- A significant proportion (65%) of eligible men were not advised to take aspirin by their healthcare providers.
- Among those prescribed aspirin, 30% were non-compliant, and 1.2% discontinued due to side effects. Inappropriately prescribed aspirin was also observed in those not qualifying.
Conclusions:
- Physician under-prescription and patient non-compliance were significant issues regarding the 2009 USPSTF aspirin guidelines.
- Younger age and fewer comorbidities were associated with both under-prescription and lower patient compliance.
- These findings suggest potential challenges in implementing updated 2016 USPSTF recommendations due to similar influencing factors.
Objective:
In 2009, United States Preventive Services Taskforce (USPSTF) recommends aspirin (ASA) for men aged 45-79 years when the benefit of coronary artery disease (CAD) risk reduction outweighs the harm of gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Our objective is to evaluate compliance with this USPSTF recommendation.
Methods:
This study is a cross-sectional study and 2011-2012 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) dataset was used for this study. Out of the available sample, 1155 (11.8%) had the inclusion criteria (men aged 45-79 years, no prior history of CAD). The participants' 10-year Framingham risk score for developing CAD was calculated to identify the people who meet criteria to take aspirin. The population characteristics that influence the physicians' decision to prescribe aspirin and the characteristics those influence the participants' compliance with doctor's advice to take aspirin were identified.
Results:
Almost 91.5% qualified for aspirin intake. About 65% (595/916) of them were not advised by their providers to take aspirin. Among the 321 who were prescribed aspirin, 30% (96/321) were non-compliant and 1.2% (4/321) discontinued aspirin because of side effects. In the group that did not qualify for aspirin, 37.6% (32/85) were inappropriately prescribed aspirin out of which 78.1% (25/32) were actually taking it. Younger age and lesser comorbidities were significantly associated with under prescription by physicians (P < .001) and lower compliance by participants (P < .001).
Conclusions:
In April 2016, USPSTF updated the recommendations regarding benefits of aspirin. Our study evaluates the factors that influenced the compliance with the 2009 recommendations. This study highlights the challenges that the 2016 guidelines might have to face.
Related Concept Videos
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT

