Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 15, 2026

Exploring Infant Sensitivity to Visual Language using Eye Tracking and the Preferential Looking Paradigm
Published on: May 15, 2019
Salience in Second Language Acquisition: Physical Form, Learner Attention, and Instructional Focus
Myrna C Cintrón-Valentín1, Nick C Ellis2
1Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor MI, USA.
Adult language learners prioritize salient cues, but form-focused instruction (FFI) helps them attend to less obvious morphosyntactic features. Prior experience shapes attention, and FFI can overcome learned blocking for better L2 acquisition.
Area of Science:
- Second Language Acquisition
- Cognitive Psychology
- Linguistic Psychology
Background:
- Learners often prioritize physically salient cues over less obvious ones, like morphosyntax.
- Prior linguistic experience can create 'learned attention,' blocking new information.
- Form-focused instruction (FFI) aims to improve attention to crucial linguistic features.
Purpose of the Study:
- Investigate how physical salience, prior experience, and FFI impact adult L2 learners' attention to morphological cues.
- Examine attentional processes in L2 acquisition, specifically how FFI overcomes cue salience and learned blocking.
- Determine the role of input modality (aural vs. visual) in L2 morphological processing and FFI effectiveness.
Main Methods:
- Experiment 1: Eye-tracking of Chinese native speakers learning Latin, comparing control conditions (CCs) with three FFI types (verb grammar instruction, verb salience, verb pretraining).
- Experiment 2: Investigated L1 English learners' attention to morphological cues with aural vs. visual input and different FFI manipulations.
- Assessed cue utilization via comprehension tests and eye-tracking data to analyze attentional focus and processing.
Main Results:
- In Experiment 1, learners initially favored adverbs over verb morphology, but FFI increased sensitivity to verb morphology.
- FFI effectively enhanced attention to verb-tense morphology in both experiments.
- Input modality affected processing: visual input was generally easier, and FFI effectiveness varied across modalities (e.g., verb salience effective visually, not aurally).
Conclusions:
- Learners' attention is shaped by prior experience and cue salience.
- FFI is crucial for overcoming attention biases and learned blocking in L2 acquisition.
- Optimizing FFI requires considering input modality and specific instructional techniques to enhance morphological cue processing.
More Related Videos
09:09Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
Published on: September 27, 2024
05:38Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology
Published on: June 29, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Language Development
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...
Auditory Perception
Components of Language
Purposive Learning
Language and Cognition
Hearing