Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 15, 2026

Improved Home Blood Pressure Control by CT-guided Ozone-mediated Renal Denervation for Patients with Resistant Hypertension
Published on: June 6, 2025
Cost-effectiveness of Intensive Blood Pressure Management
Ilana B Richman1, Michael Fairley2, Mads Emil Jørgensen3
1Palo Alto VA Health Care System, Palo Alto, California2Center for Primary Care and Outcomes Research/Center for Health Policy, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Insights
Intensive blood pressure management for high-risk hypertension patients is cost-effective, offering more quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) at a reasonable cost per QALY gained. This approach remains valuable even if adverse events are more frequent.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Health Economics
- Clinical Hypertension Management
Background:
- Lowering systolic blood pressure to 120 mm Hg in high-risk hypertension patients reduces cardiovascular events.
- Intensive blood pressure management increases treatment and adverse event costs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the incremental cost-effectiveness of intensive versus standard blood pressure management.
- To compare the long-term costs and health outcomes of two hypertension treatment strategies.
Main Methods:
- A Markov cohort model was used for cost-effectiveness analysis in high-risk adults with hypertension (excluding diabetes).
- Data from the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) informed treatment effects and adverse event rates.
- Lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were projected and discounted at 3%.
Main Results:
- Intensive management (120 mm Hg goal) yielded 10.5 QALYs and cost $176,584, compared to 9.6 QALYs and $155,261 for standard management (140 mm Hg goal).
- The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for intensive management was $23,777 per QALY gained.
- Sensitivity analysis indicated standard management would only be preferred if adverse events were 3x more common in the intensive arm.
Conclusions:
- Intensive blood pressure management is a cost-effective strategy for high-risk hypertension patients at standard healthcare value thresholds.
- The cost-effectiveness holds even with significantly increased rates of adverse events compared to observed rates in SPRINT.
Importance:
Among high-risk patients with hypertension, targeting a systolic blood pressure of 120 mm Hg reduces cardiovascular morbidity and mortality compared with a higher target. However, intensive blood pressure management incurs additional costs from treatment and from adverse events.
Objective:
To evaluate the incremental cost-effectiveness of intensive blood pressure management compared with standard management.
Design, Setting, And Participants:
This cost-effectiveness analysis conducted from September 2015 to August 2016 used a Markov cohort model to estimate cost-effectiveness of intensive blood pressure management among 68-year-old high-risk adults with hypertension but not diabetes. We used the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) to estimate treatment effects and adverse event rates. We used Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Life Tables to project age- and cause-specific mortality, calibrated to rates reported in SPRINT. We also used population-based observational data to model development of heart failure, myocardial infarction, stroke, and subsequent mortality. Costs were based on published sources, Medicare data, and the National Inpatient Sample.
Interventions:
Treatment of hypertension to a systolic blood pressure goal of 120 mm Hg (intensive management) or 140 mm Hg (standard management).
Main Outcomes And Measures:
Lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), discounted at 3% annually.
Results:
Standard management yielded 9.6 QALYs and accrued $155 261 in lifetime costs, while intensive management yielded 10.5 QALYs and accrued $176 584 in costs. Intensive blood pressure management cost $23 777 per QALY gained. In a sensitivity analysis, serious adverse events would need to occur at 3 times the rate observed in SPRINT and be 3 times more common in the intensive management arm to prefer standard management.
Conclusions And Relevance:
Intensive blood pressure management is cost-effective at typical thresholds for value in health care and remains so even with substantially higher adverse event rates.
Related Concept Videos
Hypertension IV: Drug Therapy and Lifestyle Modifications
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Hypertension V: Nursing Management
Factors affecting Blood pressure
Physiological Factors:
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Atherosclerosis III: Management

