Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

688
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
688
Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

473
Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
473
Censoring Survival Data01:09

Censoring Survival Data

626
Survival analysis is a statistical method used to analyze time-to-event data, often employed in fields such as medicine, engineering, and social sciences. One of the key challenges in survival analysis is dealing with incomplete data, a phenomenon known as "censoring." Censoring occurs when the event of interest (such as death, relapse, or system failure) has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period or is otherwise unobservable, and it might have many different...
626
Introduction To Survival Analysis01:18

Introduction To Survival Analysis

913
Survival analysis is a statistical method used to study time-to-event data, where the "event" might represent outcomes like death, disease relapse, system failure, or recovery. A unique feature of survival data is censoring, which occurs when the event of interest has not been observed for some individuals during the study period. This requires specialized techniques to handle incomplete data effectively.
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time...
913
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test01:09

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

6.2K
The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...
6.2K
Truncation in Survival Analysis01:09

Truncation in Survival Analysis

680
Truncation in survival analysis refers to the exclusion of individuals or events from the dataset based on specific criteria related to the time of the event. This exclusion can happen in two primary forms: left truncation and right truncation.
Left truncation occurs when individuals who experienced the event of interest before a certain time are not included in the study. This is often due to a "delayed entry" into the study where only those who survive until a certain entry point are...
680

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Power Considerations for Multiple-Group (Controlled) Interrupted Time Series Analysis: A Comprehensive Simulation Study.

Evaluation & the health professions·2026
Same author

Electronic connectivity between hospital pairs: impact on emergency department-related utilization.

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA·2025
Same author

A Comprehensive Simulation Study to Evaluate the Effect Size and Study Length Relationship in Single-Group Interrupted Time Series Analysis.

Evaluation & the health professions·2025
Same author

Adenotonsillectomy and Health Care Utilization in Children With Snoring and Mild Sleep Apnea: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA pediatrics·2025
Same author

Health Care Resource Use and Costs After Hospitalization With Multiple Organ Dysfunction in Children.

JAMA network open·2025
Same author

Problematic meta-analyses: Bayesian and frequentist perspectives on combining randomized controlled trials and non-randomized studies.

BMC medical research methodology·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 15, 2026

Author Spotlight: Alignment of Synchronized Time-Series Data Using the Characterizing Loss of Cell Cycle Synchrony Model for Cross-Experiment Comparisons
07:59

Author Spotlight: Alignment of Synchronized Time-Series Data Using the Characterizing Loss of Cell Cycle Synchrony Model for Cross-Experiment Comparisons

Published on: June 9, 2023

2.0K

Challenges to validity in single-group interrupted time series analysis.

Ariel Linden1,2

  • 1Linden Consulting Group, LLC, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
|September 16, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Single-group interrupted time series analysis (ITSA) can be misleading due to external events. Using a control group is crucial for accurate causal inference in policy evaluation.

Keywords:
causal inferenceinterrupted time series analysisquasi-experimental

More Related Videos

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents
10:27

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents

Published on: April 19, 2019

7.4K
Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 15, 2026

Author Spotlight: Alignment of Synchronized Time-Series Data Using the Characterizing Loss of Cell Cycle Synchrony Model for Cross-Experiment Comparisons
07:59

Author Spotlight: Alignment of Synchronized Time-Series Data Using the Characterizing Loss of Cell Cycle Synchrony Model for Cross-Experiment Comparisons

Published on: June 9, 2023

2.0K
The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents
10:27

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents

Published on: April 19, 2019

7.4K
Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.7K

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Public Health Policy
  • Statistical Analysis

Background:

  • Single-group interrupted time series analysis (ITSA) is a common method for evaluating interventions.
  • A major limitation of single-group ITSA is the threat of 'history,' where external events may confound results.
  • Control groups are essential to establish counterfactuals and improve causal inference.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To illustrate how external events can bias single-group ITSA results.
  • To demonstrate the importance of using control groups in interrupted time series analysis.
  • To highlight the limitations of single-group ITSA in policy evaluation.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of time series data from two natural experiments: Florida's motorcycle helmet law repeal and California's Proposition 99 cigarette sales reduction.
  • Comparison of single-group ITSA results with those obtained using a comparable control group.
  • Examination of potential confounding historical events in both case studies.

Main Results:

  • In Florida, an external event, not the helmet law repeal, was identified as the cause of increased motorcycle fatalities when compared to control states.
  • In California, pre-existing trends in cigarette sales, not solely Proposition 99, influenced sales figures, a finding reinforced by control state comparisons.
  • Control group comparisons revealed biases in single-group ITSA that were not apparent otherwise.

Conclusions:

  • Results from single-group ITSA should be interpreted with caution due to the potential for historical confounding.
  • The inclusion of a comparable control group significantly strengthens the validity of interrupted time series analysis.
  • More robust study designs incorporating control groups are recommended for reliable policy impact assessment.