Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Cochlea01:13

The Cochlea

52.2K
The cochlea is a coiled structure in the inner ear that contains hair cells—the sensory receptors of the auditory system. Sound waves are transmitted to the cochlea by small bones attached to the eardrum called the ossicles, which vibrate the oval window that leads to the inner ear. This causes fluid in the chambers of the cochlea to move, vibrating the basilar membrane.
52.2K
Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location01:21

Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location

1.3K
The human brain perceives pitch through two primary mechanisms reflected in place theory and frequency theory. Each mechanism describes how sound waves are interpreted as specific pitches by the brain, offering insights into the intricate processes of auditory perception.
Place theory, or place coding, suggests that different pitches are heard because various sound waves activate specific locations along the cochlea's basilar membrane. The brain determines the pitch of a sound by...
1.3K
Auditory Pathway01:15

Auditory Pathway

8.5K
Auditory pathways constitute the complex neural circuits responsible for transmitting and interpreting auditory information from the peripheral auditory system to the brain. Sound waves are initially captured by the outer ear, funneled through the ear canal, and reach the tympanic membrane (eardrum). These vibrations are transmitted via the middle ear's ossicles to the inner ear's cochlea.
When viewed cross-sectionally, the cochlea reveals the scala vestibuli and scala tympani flanking...
8.5K
Anatomy of the Ear01:16

Anatomy of the Ear

13.1K
Auditory sensation, commonly called hearing, involves the transformation of sonic waves into neural impulses facilitated by the structures of the auditory organ. The prominent, flesh-like structure on the side of the head, called the auricle, directs sound waves towards the auditory canal. The auricle is often mislabeled as the pinna, a term more aligned with mobile structures like a feline's external ear. The auditory canal penetrates the cranium via the external auditory meatus of the...
13.1K
Hearing01:31

Hearing

58.4K
When we hear a sound, our nervous system is detecting sound waves—pressure waves of mechanical energy traveling through a medium. The frequency of the wave is perceived as pitch, while the amplitude is perceived as loudness.
58.4K
Hair Cells01:22

Hair Cells

46.2K
Hair cells are the sensory receptors of the auditory system—they transduce mechanical sound waves into electrical energy that the nervous system can understand. Hair cells are located in the organ of Corti within the cochlea of the inner ear, between the basilar and tectorial membranes. The actual sensory receptors are called inner hair cells. The outer hair cells serve other functions, such as sound amplification in the cochlea, and are not discussed in detail here.
46.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Level-dependent IMD cancellation for single-transducer DPOAE measurement using a lookup-table method.

MethodsX·2026
Same author

Enhancing EEG-Based Brain Pattern Recognition Through Functional-Network-Level Volume Conduction Mitigation: Spatially Informed Decay Modeling-Residual Correction.

Brain sciences·2026
Same author

Altered Paired-Click Auditory Brainstem Responses in Normal-Hearing Young Adults With Frequent Loud Sound Exposure.

Trends in hearing·2026
Same author

Effects of cues and modulation depth on the measurement of modulation masking pattern.

JASA express letters·2026
Same author

Development of Adhesive and Suction Vibrators for Enabling Easy Fixation in Distantly-Presented Bone-Conducted Ultrasound.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2025
Same author

Effects of noise exposure on intelligibility of bone-conducted speech during earplugging.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 15, 2026

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

916

Relation Between Cochlear Mechanics and Performance of Temporal Fine Structure-Based Tasks.

Sho Otsuka1,2, Shigeto Furukawa3, Shimpei Yamagishi4

  • 1Department of Human and Engineered Environmental Studies, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8563, Japan. otsuka.s@lab.ntt.co.jp.

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO
|September 16, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Cochlear mechanics influence how well individuals use temporal fine structure (TFS) information for hearing. Specific otoacoustic emission patterns correlate with TFS abilities, suggesting mechanical irregularities impact auditory processing.

Keywords:
amplitude modulation detectionfrequency modulation detectioninteraural time differencemultiple regression analysisotoacoustic emissionprincipal component analysistemporal fine structure

More Related Videos

Morphological and Functional Evaluation of Ribbon Synapses at Specific Frequency Regions of the Mouse Cochlea
09:54

Morphological and Functional Evaluation of Ribbon Synapses at Specific Frequency Regions of the Mouse Cochlea

Published on: May 10, 2019

12.8K
Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations
06:34

Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations

Published on: July 1, 2015

17.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 15, 2026

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

916
Morphological and Functional Evaluation of Ribbon Synapses at Specific Frequency Regions of the Mouse Cochlea
09:54

Morphological and Functional Evaluation of Ribbon Synapses at Specific Frequency Regions of the Mouse Cochlea

Published on: May 10, 2019

12.8K
Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations
06:34

Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations

Published on: July 1, 2015

17.0K

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Otoacoustic Emissions

Background:

  • Individual differences in hearing ability are significant.
  • Temporal fine structure (TFS) processing is crucial for speech intelligibility, especially in noise.
  • The role of cochlear mechanics in TFS sensitivity is not fully understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between cochlear mechanical characteristics and individual variation in TFS sensitivity.
  • To determine if otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) can predict TFS abilities.
  • To differentiate between neural and mechanical factors influencing auditory perception.

Main Methods:

  • Measured cochlear mechanical functioning using swept-tone evoked otoacoustic emissions (OAEs).
  • Assessed TFS sensitivity using low-rate frequency modulation detection limens (FMDLs) and interaural phase difference (IPD) thresholds.
  • Evaluated sensitivity to non-TFS cues using high-rate FMDLs and amplitude modulation detection limens (AMDLs).
  • Employed principal component analysis (PCA) to identify common factors influencing auditory measures.

Main Results:

  • Significant correlations were observed between low-rate FMDLs, low-rate AMDLs, and IPD thresholds, suggesting a common underlying factor.
  • A specific OAE feature (a dip around 2-2.5 kHz) significantly correlated with this common factor (R=0.54).
  • High-rate FMDLs and AMDLs were correlated with each other but not with TFS-related measures, indicating distinct processing pathways.

Conclusions:

  • Low-rate AMDLs, IPD thresholds, and low-rate FMDLs depend on TFS information encoded via neural phase locking.
  • Cochlear mechanical properties, potentially including mechanical irregularity along the basilar membrane, influence the utilization of TFS information.
  • OAEs can serve as a non-invasive indicator of cochlear mechanics relevant to TFS processing.