Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 15, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Molecular Biomarker Testing for Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Published on: September 8, 2023
Interaction of Treatment and Biomarker in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Pingfu Fu1, Nathan A Pennell, Neelesh Sharma
1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106, United States.
Purpose:
There has been a long-standing interest in the investigation of interactions in science. The objective of the study is to evaluate interaction between Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) mutation and treatment from randomized, phase II study of chemotherapy versus chemotherapy plus erlotinib in patients with progressive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) following clinical benefit from erlotinib.
Materials And Methods:
Forty-six patients with advanced stage NSCLC and progression from erlotinib were randomized to receive chemotherapy (pemetrexed or docetaxel) or chemotherapy plus erlotinib between 2008 and 2012. Patient characteristics at baseline including age, gender, tumor stage, race, smoking history and EGFR mutation status along with the clinical outcomes, namely response, Progression- Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) were obtained. The effects of treatment, EGFR mutation and interaction between the two on survival outcomes were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards model with first-order interaction.
Results:
For PFS, there was a significant interaction between treatment (arm B) and EGFR mutation (mutant EGFR+) (p = 0.018), although the main effects of treatment (arm B vs. arm A) and EGFR mutation (mutant vs. wild-type EGFR) were statistically significant (with p = 0.03 and p = 0.088, respectively) favoring arm B and mutant EGFR+. Thus when taking the interaction between treatment and EGFR into account, the hazard ratio comparing arm B to arm A when EGFR is positive was 1.49 (95% CI: 0.72, 3.11); and the hazard ratio comparing arm B to arm A when EGFR is negative was 0.17 (95% CI: 0.04 - 0.84). Similarly, for OS, there was a significant interaction between treatment and EGFR mutation (p = 0.02), with significant main effects of treatment and EGFR favoring arm B and mutant EFGR+. Taking together, the hazard ratio comparing arm B to arm A when EGFR is positive was 1.61 (95% CI: 0.68 - 3.82); and the hazard ratio comparing arm B to arm A when EGFR is negative was 0.16 (95% CI: 0.03 - 0.9).
Conclusion:
The interaction identified by Cox model shows there was an antagonistic effect between chemotherapy + erlotinib and EGFR mutation, a situation that the whole is less than the sum of the parts, despite the prolonging-survival main effect of each factor from Cox model. As a result, the continuing erlotinib beyond progression adds no benefit in survival outcomes but leads to an increase in adverse events.
Insights
Chemotherapy plus erlotinib showed an antagonistic effect with EGFR mutations in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients. Continuing erlotinib after progression did not improve survival and increased adverse events.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Medical Genetics
- Clinical Pharmacology
Background:
- Interactions between treatments and genetic mutations are crucial in personalized medicine.
- Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) mutations are key targets in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC).
- Erlotinib is a targeted therapy for NSCLC, but its efficacy post-progression requires investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the interaction between EGFR mutation status and treatment strategy (chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy plus erlotinib) in advanced NSCLC patients.
- To determine the impact of this interaction on Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS).
Main Methods:
- A randomized phase II study involving 46 patients with advanced NSCLC who progressed on erlotinib.
- Patients received either chemotherapy or chemotherapy plus erlotinib.
- Cox proportional hazards models with first-order interaction were used to analyze treatment effects, EGFR mutation effects, and their interaction on survival outcomes.
Main Results:
- A significant interaction between treatment and EGFR mutation was observed for both PFS (p=0.018) and OS (p=0.02).
- While chemotherapy plus erlotinib favored wild-type EGFR, it showed poorer outcomes in mutant EGFR patients compared to chemotherapy alone.
- Hazard ratios indicated a potential benefit of chemotherapy plus erlotinib in EGFR-negative patients but not in EGFR-positive patients.
Conclusions:
- An antagonistic interaction exists between chemotherapy plus erlotinib and EGFR mutations in advanced NSCLC.
- Continuing erlotinib beyond progression offers no survival benefit and may increase adverse events.
- Treatment decisions in NSCLC should consider EGFR mutation status and potential treatment interactions.
More Related Videos
07:42Patient-Derived Tumor Explants As a "Live" Preclinical Platform for Predicting Drug Resistance in Patients
Published on: February 7, 2021
10:29Semi-automatic PD-L1 Characterization and Enumeration of Circulating Tumor Cells from Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients by Immunofluorescence
Published on: August 14, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...