Do anthropometric measures accurately reflect body composition in preterm infants?

S E Ramel1, L Zhang2, S Misra3

  • 1Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Pediatric Obesity
|September 17, 2016
PubMed

Insights

Weight is a good indicator of lean mass in preterm infants, but standard weight-to-length ratios do not accurately measure body fat. These indices are not suitable for assessing adiposity in newborns.

Area of Science:

  • Neonatal physiology
  • Pediatric nutrition
  • Body composition analysis

Background:

  • Neonatal adiposity and lean mass predict later metabolic and cognitive health, respectively, in preterm infants.
  • Accurate anthropometric indices for neonatal body composition are needed for clinical care and research.
  • Existing indices have not been systematically validated in preterm infants.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify the most effective weight/length indices for assessing neonatal body composition in preterm infants.
  • To evaluate the validity of anthropometric proxies for fat-free mass (FFM), fat mass (FM), and percent body fat (%BF) at birth.

Main Methods:

  • 218 preterm infants had body composition (FFM, FM, %BF) measured via air-displacement plethysmography within 72 hours of birth.
  • Weight and length were recorded.
  • Linear regression models assessed weight/length indices, using variance explained (R² ) and root mean square error (RMSE) to determine the best proxies.

Main Results:

  • Body weight alone was a strong predictor of FFM (R² =0.97).
  • Weight/length² was the best proxy for %BF, but explained little variance (R² =0.27) and had high prediction error (RMSE=3.5% fat).
  • No tested weight/length index accurately reflected %BF.

Conclusions:

  • Weight/length indices are unsuitable for assessing relative adiposity in preterm infants at birth.
  • Body weight is an adequate surrogate for lean mass in preterm neonates.
  • Further research is needed to establish reliable methods for assessing adiposity in preterm infants.
Abstract