Related Experiment Videos
Theoretical and methodological considerations of self-concept measurement
1Psychology Department, University of California, Los Angeles.
Adolescence
|January 1, 1989
Summary
This study found that observing adolescent girls' behavior provided a better measure of their self-concept than self-reports alone. Peer ratings aligned with observed behaviors, highlighting the importance of social comparison in self-perception.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Adolescent Development
- Social Psychology
Background:
- Self-concept is a multifaceted construct crucial for adolescent development.
- Previous research has explored self-concept through various measurement methods.
- Understanding the interplay between presented and experienced selves is vital.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between presented and experienced selves in adolescent girls.
- To compare multimethods of self-concept measurement, including behavioral observations and self/peer ratings.
- To replicate aspects of the Savin-Williams and Jaquish (1981) study.
Main Methods:
- Utilized behavioral observations and self- and peer ratings.
- Assessed three dimensions of self: self-confidence, popularity, and athletic skill.
- Focused on seven adolescent girls in a Southern California high school team sport.
Main Results:
- Significant correlations were found between behavioral observations and peer ratings.
- Limited correlations were observed between behavioral observations and self-ratings.
- Weak correlations were found between peer ratings and self-ratings.
Conclusions:
- A behavioral approach to measuring self-concept across situations offers greater insight into its multidimensionality than self-report alone.
- Self-concept measurement necessitates greater sensitivity to domain definition, saliency, and individual variability.
- The influence of reference groups and prior experiences on current self-views is critical.