Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 14, 2026

Pool-Boiling Heat-Transfer Enhancement on Cylindrical Surfaces with Hybrid Wettable Patterns
Published on: April 10, 2017
Does water kill? A call for less casual causal inferences.
1Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Boston, MA.
Scientists can determine causal effects using the potential outcomes approach. This article explains the consistency condition, crucial for interpreting results in real-world decision-making.
Area of Science:
- Causal inference
- Quantitative theory
- Decision science
Background:
- Interpreting quantitative results as causal effects is a critical challenge.
- The potential outcomes approach provides a framework for causal inference.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the consistency condition within the potential outcomes framework.
- To discuss the implications of consistency for practical decision-making.
Main Methods:
- Review of the potential outcomes approach in causal inference.
- Explanation of the consistency condition and its assumptions.
Main Results:
- Consistency is a necessary condition for identifying causal effects.
- Understanding consistency clarifies when observed data can inform causal questions.
Conclusions:
- The consistency condition is vital for valid causal effect estimation.
- Applying the concept of consistency enhances the reliability of real-world decisions based on quantitative data.
Related Concept Videos
Heating and Cooling Curves
For instance, the addition of heat raises the temperature of a solid; the amount of heat absorbed depends on the heat capacity of the solid (q = mcsolidΔT). According to thermochemistry, the relation between the amount of heat absorbed or released by a substance, q, and its...
Statistical Significance
Clausius-Clapeyron Equation
Vapor Pressure
Random Error
Distribution of Molecular Speeds

