Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 14, 2026

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
Published on: January 26, 2024
Blind prediction of distribution in the SAMPL5 challenge with QM based protomer and pK a corrections
Frank C Pickard1, Gerhard König2,3, Florentina Tofoleanu2
1Laboratory of Computational Biology, National Institutes of Health - National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, 5635 Fishers Lane, T-900 Suite, Rockville, MD, 20852, USA. frank.pickard@nih.gov.
Abstract:
The computation of distribution coefficients between polar and apolar phases requires both an accurate characterization of transfer free energies between phases and proper accounting of ionization and protomerization. We present a protocol for accurately predicting partition coefficients between two immiscible phases, and then apply it to 53 drug-like molecules in the SAMPL5 blind prediction challenge. Our results combine implicit solvent QM calculations with classical MD simulations using the non-Boltzmann Bennett free energy estimator. The OLYP/DZP/SMD method yields predictions that have a small deviation from experiment (RMSD = 2.3 [Formula: see text] D units), relative to other participants in the challenge. Our free energy corrections based on QM protomer and [Formula: see text] calculations increase the correlation between predicted and experimental distribution coefficients, for all methods used. Unfortunately, these corrections are overly hydrophilic, and fail to account for additional effects such as aggregation, water dragging and the presence of polar impurities in the apolar phase. We show that, although expensive, QM-NBB free energy calculations offer an accurate and robust method that is superior to standard MM and QM techniques alone.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Predicting Reaction Outcomes

