Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 14, 2026

Author Spotlight: Implications of Non-Nutritive Sucking on Speech Emergence and Infant Development
Published on: April 19, 2024
A Baby-Led Approach to Eating Solids and Risk of Choking
Louise J Fangupo1, Anne-Louise M Heath1, Sheila M Williams2
1Departments of Human Nutrition.
Insights
Baby-led weaning, when guided to minimize choking risks, does not increase infant choking incidents compared to traditional methods. However, offering choking hazard foods remains a concern in both approaches.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Nutrition
- Infant Feeding Practices
- Child Safety
Background:
- Complementary feeding is a critical period for infant development.
- Concerns exist regarding choking risks associated with baby-led weaning.
- The Baby-Led Introduction to SolidS (BLISS) approach modifies baby-led weaning to address safety.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of the BLISS approach on infant choking and gagging.
- To compare choking and gagging frequencies between BLISS and control groups.
- To assess infant exposure to choking risk foods in both feeding groups.
Main Methods:
- A randomized controlled trial involving 206 healthy infants.
- Infants were assigned to either usual care (control) or the BLISS intervention.
- Data on choking, gagging, and food exposure were collected via questionnaires, daily calendars, and diet records.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in choking event frequency were observed between the BLISS and control groups.
- BLISS infants showed increased gagging at 6 months but decreased gagging at 8 months compared to controls.
- Both groups frequently received foods with choking risks, with no significant group differences.
Conclusions:
- The BLISS approach to complementary feeding does not increase infant choking risk.
- Advice on minimizing choking risks is crucial for baby-led feeding.
- A high prevalence of offering choking hazard foods to infants in both groups warrants attention.
Objective:
To determine the impact of a baby-led approach to complementary feeding on infant choking and gagging.
Methods:
Randomized controlled trial in 206 healthy infants allocated to control (usual care) or Baby-Led Introduction to SolidS (BLISS; 8 contacts from antenatal to 9 months providing resources and support). BLISS is a form of baby-led weaning (ie, infants feed themselves all their food from the beginning of complementary feeding) modified to address concerns about choking risk. Frequencies of choking and gagging were collected by questionnaire (at 6, 7, 8, 9, 12 months) and daily calendar (at 6 and 8 months); 3-day weighed diet records measured exposure to foods posing a choking risk (at 7 and 12 months).
Results:
A total of 35% of infants choked at least once between 6 and 8 months of age, and there were no significant group differences in the number of choking events at any time (all Ps > .20). BLISS infants gagged more frequently at 6 months (relative risk [RR] 1.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-2.17), but less frequently at 8 months (RR 0.60; 95% CI, 0.42-0.87), than control infants. At 7 and 12 months, 52% and 94% of infants were offered food posing a choking risk during the 3-day record, with no significant differences between groups (7 months: RR 1.12; 95% CI, 0.79-1.59; 12 months: RR 0.94; 95% CI, 0.83-1.07).
Conclusions:
Infants following a baby-led approach to feeding that includes advice on minimizing choking risk do not appear more likely to choke than infants following more traditional feeding practices. However, the large number of children in both groups offered foods that pose a choking risk is concerning.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Psychosexual Stages of Personality: Oral
Weaning, typically occurring...
Piaget's Stage 1 of Cognitive Development
Exploration...
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management
Esophageal Strictures-I: Introduction
Etiology
The primary cause of esophageal strictures is long-standing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), accounting for about 70 to 80% of adult cases. Chronic acid reflux can lead to injury and scarring of the esophageal lining, culminating in...
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube...
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...

