Early outcomes of on-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

Ghulam Hussain1, Hammad Azam2, Mirza Ahmad Raza Baig3

  • 1Ghulam Hussain. FCPS Cardiac Surgery. Assistant Professor of Cardiac Surgery, Ch. Pervaiz Elahi Institute of Cardiology (CPEIC), Multan, Pakistan.

Insights

Off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery shows better early outcomes than on-pump surgery. Patients undergoing off-pump procedures experienced less need for inotropic support, shorter ICU stays, and reduced bleeding.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Cardiac Surgery Outcomes
  • Minimally Invasive Cardiac Procedures

Background:

  • Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery is a standard treatment for coronary artery disease.
  • On-pump CABG utilizes cardiopulmonary bypass, while off-pump CABG avoids it.
  • Comparing early outcomes is crucial for surgical decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the early post-operative outcomes of off-pump versus on-pump CABG.
  • To evaluate key clinical endpoints within 30 days of surgery.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 300 patients undergoing CABG.
  • Comparison of on-pump (Group-I) and off-pump (Group-II) cohorts.
  • Statistical analysis using t-tests, Mann Whitney U, Chi-square, and Fisher's exact tests (P≤0.05 significant).

Main Results:

  • Off-pump CABG group showed significantly reduced need and duration of inotropic support (p<0.0001).
  • Shorter mechanical ventilation time and ICU stay were observed in the off-pump group (p=0.001).
  • Increased peri-operative chest drainage was noted in the on-pump group (p=0.027).

Conclusions:

  • Off-pump CABG is associated with significantly better early post-operative outcomes, including reduced bleeding and shorter ICU stays.
  • Incidence of myocardial infarction, neurologic, pulmonary, and renal complications were similar between both groups at 30 days.
Abstract