Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Variance

Variance

The deviations show how spread out the data are about the mean. A positive deviation occurs when the data value exceeds the mean, whereas a negative deviation occurs when the data value is less than the mean. If the deviations are added, the sum is always zero. So one cannot simply add the deviations to get the data spread. By squaring the deviations, the numbers are made positive; thus, their sum will also be positive.
The standard deviation measures the spread in the same units as the data....

Bias

Bias

Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:

Variability: Analysis

Variability: Analysis

Measures of variability are statistical metrics that reveal the dispersion pattern within a dataset. They are pivotal in biostatistics, providing insights into the heterogeneity within health and biological data. Variability signifies the degree to which data points diverge from one another, helping researchers understand the potential range of values and associated uncertainty within the data.
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...

What is Variation?

What is Variation?

Apart from the measures of central tendency, distribution, outliers, and the changing characteristics of data with time, an important characteristic of any data set is its variation or spread. In some data sets, the data values are concentrated closely near the mean; in others, the data values are more widely spread out from the mean.
The range, standard deviation, standard error, and variance are the different measures of variation.
Range: The range is the difference between its maximum and...

Motivational Bias

Motivational Bias

Cognitive bias results from limitations in thinking and information processing, leading to systematic errors in judgment. Conversely, motivational bias stems from personal desires or emotions, causing distortions in perception to align with self-interest. Motivational bias influences how individuals perceive and attribute causes to events, often shaped by personal needs, goals, and self-esteem preservation. This bias can distort judgment, leading to inaccurate assessments of success, failure,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Bias in Auditory Perception.

i-Perception·2016

Same journal

To appear in a new light: Varying illumination colors induce dynamic transformations of perceptual qualities in still images.

i-Perception·2026

Same journal

Pseudo-slimy: A novel phenomenon to evoke stickiness perception.

i-Perception·2026

Same journal

Predictive visual uncertainty around moving trajectories influences causality judgments in launching displays.

i-Perception·2026

Same journal

Light and shape in the work of Robert Fones.

i-Perception·2026

Same journal

Sensorimotor numerosity uniquely supports arithmetic development in children.

i-Perception·2026

Same journal

In praise of anaglyphs.

i-Perception·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 14, 2026

Decomposing the Variance in Reading Comprehension to Reveal the Unique and Common Effects of Language and Decoding

Decomposing the Variance in Reading Comprehension to Reveal the Unique and Common Effects of Language and Decoding

Published on: October 11, 2018

Own Variety Bias.

Marjoleine Sloos¹, Andrea Ariza García²

¹Interacting Minds Centre, Aarhus University, Denmark.

|September 21, 2016

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Native French speakers from Belgium and Switzerland mistakenly identified French from France as their own. However, this linguistic bias did not extend to Canadian French speakers or listeners.

Keywords:

Canadian French French biased perception dialect identification

More Related Videos

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 14, 2026

Decomposing the Variance in Reading Comprehension to Reveal the Unique and Common Effects of Language and Decoding

Decomposing the Variance in Reading Comprehension to Reveal the Unique and Common Effects of Language and Decoding

Published on: October 11, 2018

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

Area of Science:

Sociolinguistics
Psycholinguistics
Language Variation and Change

Background:

Language identification is crucial for understanding sociolinguistic perception.
Regional dialects can influence how speakers perceive their own language.
Previous research suggests a tendency for speakers to favor their own dialect.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate whether native speakers of Belgian French and Swiss French exhibit in-group bias when identifying French varieties.
To determine if Canadian French speakers show similar biases.
To explore the influence of geographical and cultural proximity on language identification.

Main Methods:

Participants included native speakers of Belgian French, Swiss French, and Canadian French.
A language identification task was employed, presenting listeners with audio clips of different French varieties.
Listeners were asked to identify the origin of the spoken French and whether it sounded like their own variety.

Main Results:

Belgian French and Swiss French speakers predominantly identified French from France as their own variety, indicating a strong in-group bias towards the standard.
Canadian French speakers did not exhibit this bias, accurately identifying French from France and not claiming it as their own.
Listeners of Canadian French also did not claim other varieties as their own, suggesting a different pattern of dialect perception.

Conclusions:

Native speakers of European French varieties show a bias towards identifying with the standard French from France.
This in-group bias is not observed in Canadian French speakers, suggesting distinct sociolinguistic perceptions.
Geographical distance and distinct linguistic features may contribute to the lack of bias in Canadian French listeners.