Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 14, 2026

08:49
External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?
Published on: June 6, 2020
16.0K
Examining Cesarean Delivery Rates Using the Robson's Ten-group Classification.
Rayshang G Yadav1, Nandita Maitra1
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College, Baroda, Vadodara, 390001 India.
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of India
|September 22, 2016
Summary
The Robson
Area of Science:
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Public Health
- Maternal-Fetal Medicine
Background:
- Cesarean delivery rates have shown a significant increase globally.
- The Robson's Ten-group classification system (TGCS) is a standardized method for auditing cesarean sections.
- Understanding cesarean delivery trends is crucial for improving maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze cesarean delivery rates over a decade using the Robson's Ten-group classification system.
- To identify key demographic and clinical groups contributing to the overall cesarean section rate.
- To provide data for targeted interventions aimed at optimizing cesarean delivery practices.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of all deliveries (vaginal and cesarean) from 2004 to 2013.
- Data were categorized annually according to the Robson's TGCS.
- Risk Ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for cesarean delivery within each Robson's group.
Main Results:
- The overall cesarean section rate (CSR) was 25.17% across 40,086 deliveries.
- Robson's groups 1 and 3 constituted 60% of the obstetric population.
- Groups 1 (37.62%) and 5 (17.06%) were the largest contributors to the total CSR; Groups 2 and 4 had high individual CSRs (47.28% and 34.74%).
- Maternal age and presentation independently correlated with the mode of delivery.
Conclusions:
- The TGCS effectively identified major contributor groups to the overall cesarean section rate.
- Focusing on the first four TGCS groups, representing approximately 75% of deliveries, is recommended for monitoring.
- Low-risk groups may harbor inappropriate cesarean section indications, necessitating closer examination.

