Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Assessment of visual function in suspected ocular malingering.

M Fahle1, G Mohn

  • 1Department of Pathophysiology of Vision and Neuro-opthalmology, University Eye Clinic, Tübingen, West Germany.

The British Journal of Ophthalmology
|August 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary

New methods help detect visual acuity malingering. These techniques adapt infant testing and use specialized filters or computer displays to assess vision objectively when deception is suspected.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The importance of structural softening for the evolution and architecture of passive margins.

Scientific reports·2016
Same author

Long-Term Effects of Serial Anodal tDCS on Motion Perception in Subjects with Occipital Stroke Measured in the Unaffected Visual Hemifield.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2013
Same author

Orientation specificity of learning vernier discriminations.

Vision research·2009
Same author

[Functional vision training after MIOL implantation].

Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft·2008
Same author

[Colour vision and acquired colour vision disturbances. Part I: basic aspects].

Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft·2006
Same author

[Central vision].

Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde·2004

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Neuroscience
  • Psychology

Background:

  • Accurate visual acuity assessment is crucial for diagnosis and treatment.
  • Malingering, or feigning visual impairment, complicates accurate assessment.
  • Existing methods may be unreliable when malingering is suspected.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce novel techniques for assessing visual acuity in suspected malingering cases.
  • To provide clinicians with objective tools to differentiate genuine visual loss from feigned impairment.

Main Methods:

  • Adaptation of the preferential looking method, typically used for infants.
  • Utilizing polarizing filters for brief, unilateral, and unaware visual stimuli presentation.
  • Employing a computer monitor with specialized spectacles for rapid, eye-specific stimulus delivery.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The presented techniques offer objective measures of visual function.
  • These methods aim to overcome patient awareness and potential deception.
  • Successful differentiation between genuine and feigned visual acuity is facilitated.

Conclusions:

  • The developed techniques provide reliable alternatives for visual acuity testing in challenging cases.
  • These methods enhance diagnostic accuracy in the presence of suspected malingering.
  • Objective assessment of visual function is improved, aiding clinical decision-making.