Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Torts II01:13

Torts II

1.3K
Intentional torts in healthcare refer to deliberate actions that cause harm or infringe on the rights of others. Understanding these torts is crucial for healthcare professionals to avoid legal liabilities and maintain ethical standards in patient care.
1.3K
Torts III01:26

Torts III

1.4K
Types of Quasi-intentional Torts in Healthcare
Quasi-intentional torts in healthcare involve acts where intent is not directed to harm an individual but results in harm due to careless or reckless speech.
1.4K
Torts I01:14

Torts I

1.8K
Torts in nursing are wrongful acts that can harm patients and potentially lead to civil liability for the involved nurse. These wrongful acts range from unintentional errors to deliberate actions. Depending on the nature and severity of the tort, a nurse found liable may face financial penalties or disciplinary actions. Understanding the distinctions between intentional, quasi-intentional, and unintentional torts is crucial for nurses to mitigate risks and provide safe patient care.
Intentional...
1.8K
Punishment01:27

Punishment

1.2K
Negative reinforcement and punishment are often confused but serve distinct functions in behavior modification. Reinforcement, whether positive or negative, increases the likelihood of a desired behavior, while punishment decreases it.
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior....
1.2K
Healthcare Agencies II01:17

Healthcare Agencies II

1.1K
There are various healthcare agencies in the United States—some of which are managed by religious institutions and others by different government branches.
Parish nursing is a growing specialty nursing profession that focuses on holistic healthcare, health promotion, and illness prevention. It blends professional nursing practice with a health ministry, focusing on health and healing within the context of a Christian community. Parish nurses serve as health educators, referral sources,...
1.1K
Ethical Dilemmas II01:30

Ethical Dilemmas II

2.7K
Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:
2.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Management of Obstetric Emergencies: Hospital Best Practices for Protecting Patients and Physicians.

American journal of law & medicine·2026
Same author

From Constitutional Protections to Medical Ethics: The Future of Pregnant Patients' Medical Self-Determination Rights After <i>Dobbs</i>.

The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics·2023
Same author

Censorship of the Patient-Physician Relationship-Reply.

JAMA·2023
Same author

The Politics of Informed Consent and the Limits of the First Amendment.

JAMA·2023
Same author

Protections From Civil Liability in State Abortion Conscience Laws.

JAMA·2019
Same author

Everything in Moderation: Dual Role Consent and State Law Mandates.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2019

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 14, 2026

High Content Screening Analysis to Evaluate the Toxicological Effects of Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents HPHC
11:38

High Content Screening Analysis to Evaluate the Toxicological Effects of Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents HPHC

Published on: May 10, 2016

12.8K

Who Judges Harm?

Nadia N Sawicki1

  • 1Loyola University School of Law, 25 East Pearson Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611 USA. nsawicki@luc.edu.

The Journal of Clinical Ethics
|September 23, 2016
PubMed
Summary

The American Medical Association's physician conscience opinion may face implementation challenges due to differing views on harm assessment. Provisions regarding physician scope and controversial procedures are predicted to be less contentious.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Physician Conscience
  • Healthcare Policy

Background:

  • The American Medical Association (AMA) developed "Opinion 1.1.7, Physician Exercise of Conscience" to balance physician beliefs with patient medical interests.
  • This opinion aims to minimize harm to both physicians and patients.
  • Ambiguity exists regarding whether harm severity is assessed internally by individuals or externally by policymakers or professional bodies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze potential implementation challenges of the AMA's "Opinion 1.1.7, Physician Exercise of Conscience."
  • To identify specific provisions of the opinion that may conflict with physicians' subjective assessments of moral harm.
  • To propose that certain provisions are less likely to face implementation hurdles.

Main Methods:

More Related Videos

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
09:12

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress

Published on: July 4, 2013

73.0K
Design, Fabrication, and Administration of the Hand Active Sensation Test HASTe
07:54

Design, Fabrication, and Administration of the Hand Active Sensation Test HASTe

Published on: September 8, 2015

9.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 14, 2026

High Content Screening Analysis to Evaluate the Toxicological Effects of Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents HPHC
11:38

High Content Screening Analysis to Evaluate the Toxicological Effects of Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents HPHC

Published on: May 10, 2016

12.8K
The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
09:12

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress

Published on: July 4, 2013

73.0K
Design, Fabrication, and Administration of the Hand Active Sensation Test HASTe
07:54

Design, Fabrication, and Administration of the Hand Active Sensation Test HASTe

Published on: September 8, 2015

9.6K
  • Commentary analysis of the AMA's "Opinion 1.1.7, Physician Exercise of Conscience."
  • Examination of the potential for conflict between external (AMA) and internal (physician) assessments of moral harm.
  • Focus on provisions (b) and (e) concerning information disclosure.

Main Results:

  • Conflicts between external and internal harm assessments may challenge the implementation of some opinion provisions.
  • Provisions (b) and (e), detailing physician scope of practice and controversial procedure information, are less likely to conflict with physicians' subjective harm assessments.
  • These specific provisions are predicted to face fewer implementation challenges.

Conclusions:

  • The implementation of AMA "Opinion 1.1.7" may be complicated by differing perspectives on harm assessment.
  • Provisions requiring physicians to disclose their scope of practice and the existence of controversial procedures are more amenable to implementation.
  • Addressing the ambiguity in harm assessment is crucial for the effective application of physician conscience guidelines.