Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Lateral differences in lexical access: word length vs. stimulus length.

R Bruyer1, D Janlin

  • 1University of Louvain, Department of Medicine, Brussels, Belgium.

Brain and Language
|August 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The cognitive approach to familiar face processing in human subjects.

Behavioural processes·2014
Same author

Age decisions on familiar and unfamiliar faces.

Behavioural processes·2014
Same author

Hypothyroidism and major depression: a common executive dysfunction?

Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology·2006
Same author

Anxiety and depression, attention, and executive functions in hypothyroidism.

Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS·2005
Same author

The Ponzo illusion with auditory substitution of vision in sighted and early-blind subjects.

Perception·2005
Same author

When audition alters vision: an event-related potential study of the cross-modal interactions between faces and voices.

Neuroscience letters·2004

This study confirms that the number of letters, not physical space, determines word length effects in brain processing. Word imagery also influences how the brain processes word length.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Psycholinguistics

Background:

  • Previous research by Young and Ellis (1985) indicated visual length of stimuli significantly impacts lateral differences in word processing.
  • They proposed the right hemisphere initially codes words graphemically, making it sensitive to word length defined by letter count.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To empirically test Young and Ellis's definition of visual length as the number of letters.
  • To investigate whether physical length or letter count is the primary determinant of lateralized word processing differences.

Main Methods:

  • An experiment involving 36 healthy participants.
  • Manipulation of word stimuli: short (4-letter) and long (7-letter) words.
  • Controlled physical length by inserting spaces into short words to match the physical dimensions of long words.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Replicated Young and Ellis's findings, confirming that the number of letters reliably defines visual length.
  • Demonstrated that word imagery value can influence the Hemifield x Length interaction, an effect not previously reported.

Conclusions:

  • The number of letters is the critical factor for visual length in lateralized word processing.
  • Word imagery introduces a novel variable affecting hemispheric processing of word length.