Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 14, 2026

Surgical Approach and Complications of Stand-alone Lateral Trans-Psoas Interbody Fusion
Published on: February 14, 2025
Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy: How to Avoid Short- and Long-Term Complications
1Department of Urology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wake Forest University Medical Center, Watlington Hall, 5th Floor, 1 Medical Center Boulevard, Winston Salem, NC, 27517, USA. camatthe@wakehealth.edu.
Abstract:
Sacrocolpopexy remains the "gold standard" procedure for management of posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse with improved anatomic outcomes compared to native tissue vaginal repair. Despite absence of clinical data, sacrocolpopexy is increasingly being offered to women as a primary treatment intervention for uterine prolapse. While reoperation rates remain low, recurrent prolapse and vaginal mesh exposure appear to increase over time. The potential morbidity associated with sacrocolpopexy is higher than for native tissue vaginal repair with complications including sacral hemorrhage, discitis, small bowel obstruction, port site herniation, and mesh erosion. Complications are more common during the learning curve of minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy. Appropriate case selection is paramount to balancing the potential for prolapse recurrence with the risk of surgical complications. Use of ultra-lightweight polypropylene mesh and vaginal mesh attachment with delayed absorbable suture may reduce the risks of vaginal mesh exposure.

