Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 14, 2026

Development and Implementation of a Multi-Disciplinary Technology Enhanced Care Pathway for Youth and Adults with Concussion
Published on: January 20, 2019
Multidisciplinary approach to decrease pediatric trauma undertriage
Benjamin Eithun1, Ankush Gosain2
1Pediatric Trauma Program, American Family Children's Hospital, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wisconsin.
Insights
Improving pediatric trauma care, this study enhanced trauma activation criteria. Shifting leveling to nurses and revising criteria reduced undertriage to 5.3% and overtriage to 18.2%, ensuring accurate patient identification and resource allocation.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Trauma Care
- Process Improvement in Healthcare
- Emergency Medicine
Background:
- Trauma activation and leveling criteria aim to balance undertriage (UT) and overtriage (OT) risks.
- American College of Surgeons (ACS) guidelines recommend UT ≤5% and OT 25%-50%.
- Intervention focused on improving accuracy and modifying criteria for identifying severely injured children.
Purpose of the Study:
- To enhance the accuracy of trauma leveling and activation criteria in a pediatric trauma center.
- To reduce undertriage (UT) and overtriage (OT) rates.
- To ensure sustainable improvements in pediatric trauma patient identification and resource utilization.
Main Methods:
- Prospective, interventional process improvement study at an ACS-verified level I pediatric trauma center.
- Phase I: Shifted trauma leveling responsibility from physicians to nursing care team leaders.
- Phase II: Implemented revised, evidence-based activation criteria; sustainability assessed in 2014.
Main Results:
- Phase I: Improved accuracy from 70% to 99%; UT decreased from 10% to 8%; OT decreased from 37.5% to 33.3%.
- Phase II: UT further decreased to 5.1%; OT increased to 40%.
- Sustainability (2014): UT at 5.3%, OT at 18.2%; adherence to criteria remained high (95%).
Conclusions:
- Transferring trauma leveling to nursing staff significantly improved accuracy.
- Revised activation criteria, incorporating CDC and ACS guidelines and tailored to the population, sustainably reduced UT.
- The interventions effectively optimized the balance between identifying severe injuries and efficient resource allocation.
Background:
Trauma activation and/or leveling criteria are designed to balance the potential harm to individual patients from undertriage (UT) of severe injuries versus overutilization of resources from overtriage (OT) of lesser injuries. The American College of Surgeons (ACS) recommends an acceptable UT rate ≤5% and OT 25%-50%. To improve UT or OT, an intervention was performed to (1) improve accuracy in following established leveling criteria and (2) modify activation criteria in an evidence-based manner to better identify severely injured children.
Methods:
Results from a prospective, interventional process improvement study performed at an ACS-verified level I pediatric trauma center are reported. The baseline period included all pediatric trauma patients who met registry inclusion criteria for 2010. The intervention period included two consecutive 3-mo periods in 2011-2012; phase I of the study involved moving the leveling responsibility from emergency department physicians to the nursing care team leaders. Phase II of the study implemented revised leveling criteria. Sustainability was assessed by evaluating data from 2014.
Results:
In phase I, accuracy in assigned trauma activation level improved from 70% to 99%. UT decreased 10%-8%, and OT decreased 37.5%-33.3%. In phase II, UT decreased 8%-5.1%, and OT increased 33%-40%. Adherence to the activation criteria remained stable (95%). For 2014, UT was 5.3% and OT was 18.2% demonstrating sustainability.
Conclusions:
Shifting trauma leveling responsibilities to nursing care team leaders improved accuracy. Revising the activation criteria to include Center for Disease Control and ACS guidelines, as well as tailoring the activation criteria to the program-specific population, further reduced UT rates in a sustainable fashion.
Related Concept Videos
Flail Chest-II
Assessment:
1. Clinical Evaluation:
History:
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...

