Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 14, 2026

Robot-assisted Total Mesorectal Excision and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle-low Rectal Cancer
Published on: February 12, 2022
Application of anchoring stitch prevents rectal prolapse in laparoscopic assisted anorectal pullthrough
Jessie L Leung1, Patrick H Y Chung1, Paul K H Tam1
1Division of Paediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong.
Insights
An anchoring stitch significantly reduces rectal prolapse and soiling after laparoscopic assisted anorectal pullthrough for anorectal malformation in children. This technique improves clinical outcomes for patients undergoing this complex surgical procedure.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Surgery
- Gastroenterology
- Anorectal Malformations
Background:
- Rectal prolapse is a known complication following laparoscopic assisted anorectal pullthrough for anorectal malformation.
- The efficacy of an anchoring stitch in preventing rectal prolapse requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the clinical outcomes of laparoscopic assisted anorectal pullthrough.
- To assess the impact of an anchoring stitch on reducing rectal prolapse and soiling.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 34 children undergoing laparoscopic assisted anorectal pullthrough (2000-2015).
- Patients divided into two groups: with anchoring stitch (Group I) and without (Group II).
- Analysis of outcomes including rectal prolapse, soiling, bowel control, constipation, and Kelly Score.
Main Results:
- Rectal prolapse occurred significantly less in Group I (20%) compared to Group II (64%) (p=0.008).
- Soiling rates were lower in Group I (55%) versus Group II (79%), though not statistically significant (p=0.167).
- Operative time was significantly shorter in Group I (p=0.048), while bowel control and constipation were comparable.
Conclusions:
- Application of an anchoring stitch is effective in reducing rectal prolapse after laparoscopic assisted anorectal pullthrough.
- The anchoring stitch may also contribute to decreased soiling, warranting further study.
- This technique offers improved outcomes for children with anorectal malformation.
Background:
Rectal prolapse has been reported after laparoscopic assisted anorectal pullthrough in children with anorectal malformation. We report our clinical outcome and study the application of an anchoring stitch to tack the rectum to the presacral fascia and the occurrence of rectal prolapse.
Material And Methods:
A retrospective review of all children who had undergone laparoscopic assisted anorectal pullthrough for anorectal malformation from 2000 to 2015 was performed. Patients were divided into two groups (group I: with anchoring stitch, group II: without anchoring stitch). Outcome measures including rectal prolapse, soiling, voluntary bowel control, and constipation, and Kelly Score were analyzed.
Results:
There were thirty-four patients (group I, n=20; group II, n=14) undergoing laparoscopic assisted anorectal pullthrough during the study period. The median follow up duration for group I and group II was 60months and 168months, respectively. All patients had stoma performed prior to the operation. Both groups consisted of patients with high type (30% vs 57%, p=0.12) and intermediate type (70% vs 43%, p=0.12) anorectal malformation. Seven (35%) patients in group I and 3 (21%) in group II had concomitant vertebral and spinal cord pathologies (p=0.408). The mean operative time was significantly shorter in group I (193±63min vs 242±49min, p=0.048). Rectal prolapse occurred less in group I, 4 (20%) vs 9 (64%) patients in group II and was statistically significant (p=0.008). Median time to development of rectal prolapse was 7months in group I and 5months in group II (p=0.767). Mucosectomy was performed in 15% of group I and 36% of group II (p=0.171). Soiling occurred less in group I (55% vs 79%, p=0.167). Voluntary bowel control (85% vs 93%, p=0.499) and constipation (55% vs 64%, p=0.601) were comparable in both groups. 75% in group I and 71% in group II achieved a Kelly score of 5 or above (p=0.823).
Conclusions:
Our study showed application of anchoring stitch reduces rectal prolapse and soiling in laparoscopic assisted anorectal pullthrough. Treatment Study-Level III.
More Related Videos
08:26Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction
Published on: March 24, 2023
09:00Application of Straight-needle, Three-tailed, Knot-free, Peritoneal Sutures in Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Hernia Repair
Published on: November 12, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...