Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 14, 2026

Multiplex Therapeutic Drug Monitoring by Isotope-dilution HPLC-MS/MS of Antibiotics in Critical Illnesses
Published on: August 30, 2018
Measuring Appropriate Antimicrobial Use: Attempts at Opening the Black Box
Emily S Spivak1, Sara E Cosgrove2, Arjun Srinivasan3
1Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City.
Abstract:
Indiscriminate antimicrobial use has plagued medicine since antibiotics were first introduced into clinical practice >70 years ago. Infectious diseases physicians and public health officials have advocated for preservation of these life-saving drugs for many years. With rising burden of antimicrobial-resistant organisms and Clostridium difficile infections, halting unnecessary antimicrobial use has become one of the largest public health concerns of our time. Inappropriate antimicrobial use has been quantified in various settings using numerous definitions; however, no established reference standard exists. With mounting national efforts to improve antimicrobial use, a consensus definition and standard method of measuring appropriate antimicrobial use is imperative. We review existing literature on systematic approaches to define and measure appropriate antimicrobial use, and describe a collaborative effort at developing standardized audit tools for assessing the quality of antimicrobial prescribing.
Insights
Antimicrobial resistance is a major public health concern. This study reviews methods to define and measure appropriate antimicrobial prescribing, aiming to develop standardized audit tools for better antibiotic stewardship.
Area of Science:
- Medicine
- Public Health
- Infectious Diseases
Background:
- Indiscriminate antimicrobial use for over 70 years has led to significant public health challenges.
- Rising antimicrobial resistance and Clostridium difficile infections highlight the urgent need to curb unnecessary antibiotic use.
- Current methods for quantifying inappropriate antimicrobial use lack a standardized reference.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review existing literature on systematic approaches for defining and measuring appropriate antimicrobial use.
- To describe a collaborative initiative focused on developing standardized audit tools.
- To establish a consensus definition and standard method for assessing antimicrobial prescribing quality.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature review of approaches to define and measure appropriate antimicrobial use.
- Description of a collaborative effort to develop standardized audit tools.
- Analysis of existing definitions and measurement methods for antimicrobial prescribing quality.
Main Results:
- Existing literature reveals numerous definitions and methods for quantifying antimicrobial use, but no established reference standard.
- A collaborative effort is underway to develop standardized audit tools for assessing antimicrobial prescribing quality.
- There is a critical need for a consensus definition and standard method to measure appropriate antimicrobial use.
Conclusions:
- Standardized methods and consensus definitions are imperative for effective antimicrobial stewardship.
- Developing standardized audit tools is a crucial step towards improving the quality of antimicrobial prescribing.
- Addressing inappropriate antimicrobial use is essential for combating antimicrobial resistance and improving public health outcomes.
More Related Videos
06:18Quantifying the Effects of Antimicrobials on In vitro Biofilm Architecture using COMSTAT Software
Published on: December 14, 2020
09:59Application of the Intelligent High-Throughput Antimicrobial Sensitivity Testing/Phage Screening System and Lar Index of Antimicrobial Resistance
Published on: July 21, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Antimicrobial Effectiveness
Pharmacodynamic Models: Overview
Microbial Growth Measurement: Direct Methods