Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy

Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy

Sigmoidoscopy and laparoscopy are distinct medical procedures that enable physicians to internally inspect different parts of the GI tract. Although they serve different purposes, each is essential for diagnosing and, in some cases, treating various medical conditions.
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Interpreting Australian Stillbirth Rate Trends: Implications for Surveillance and Continuous Quality Improvement.

The Medical journal of Australia·2026

Same author

Clinical Utility of Stillbirth Investigations in Australia: A Cohort Study.

The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology·2026

Same author

Implementing the Safer Baby Bundle for stillbirth prevention across Queensland maternity services using a modified breakthrough series collaborative.

Implementation science communications·2026

Same author

Identifying Key Areas to Improve Care for Families Around the Time of Stillbirth or Neonatal Death: A Survey of Maternity Services in Australia.

The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology·2026

Same author

The Routine 36-Week Scan-Is It Time for a Change in Policy and Practice? The Arguments for a Routine Third Trimester Ultrasound in Australian Healthcare.

The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology·2026

Same author

Improving care in pregnancies after perinatal loss: A national survey of maternity services in Australia.

Women and birth : journal of the Australian College of Midwives·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 14, 2026

External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?

External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?

Published on: June 6, 2020

Every caesarean section must count.

David Ellwood¹, Jeremy Oats^2,3

¹Griffith University School of Medicine, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia. d.ellwood@griffith.edu.au.

The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

|September 30, 2016

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Counting caesarean section rates (CSR) is crucial for optimizing perinatal outcomes. Without accurate tracking, rates may unnecessarily increase, leading to adverse effects for mothers and babies.

Keywords:

caesarean section harmful effects optimal rate

More Related Videos

Cecal Ligation Puncture Procedure

Cecal Ligation Puncture Procedure

Published on: May 7, 2011

Instrumentation of Near-term Fetal Sheep for Multivariate Chronic Non-anesthetized Recordings

Instrumentation of Near-term Fetal Sheep for Multivariate Chronic Non-anesthetized Recordings

Published on: October 25, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 14, 2026

External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?

External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?

Published on: June 6, 2020

Cecal Ligation Puncture Procedure

Cecal Ligation Puncture Procedure

Published on: May 7, 2011

Instrumentation of Near-term Fetal Sheep for Multivariate Chronic Non-anesthetized Recordings

Instrumentation of Near-term Fetal Sheep for Multivariate Chronic Non-anesthetized Recordings

Published on: October 25, 2015

Area of Science:

Obstetrics and Gynecology
Public Health
Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Background:

Caesarean section rates (CSR) have significantly increased globally over the past 30 years.
Concerns exist that monitoring CSR may incentivize inappropriate reductions, potentially compromising patient safety.
Caesarean sections carry short, medium, and long-term adverse effects for both mothers and newborns.

Purpose of the Study:

To emphasize the importance of accurately counting and monitoring caesarean section rates.
To argue for the necessity of tracking CSR to achieve optimal perinatal outcomes.
To highlight the risks associated with unmonitored or undercounted caesarean sections.

Main Methods:

Review of existing literature on caesarean section trends and outcomes.
Analysis of the relationship between caesarean section rates and perinatal health indicators.
Discussion of the implications of monitoring versus not monitoring CSR.

Main Results:

There is likely an optimal caesarean section rate that maximizes positive perinatal outcomes.
Inaccurate or absent counting of caesarean sections can lead to rates exceeding this optimal level.
Failure to count each caesarean section contributes to unnecessarily high overall rates.

Conclusions:

Accurate and consistent counting of all caesarean sections is essential for clinical and public health monitoring.
Monitoring CSR is necessary to identify and address deviations from the optimal rate, thereby improving maternal and infant health.
The practice of counting caesarean sections is vital to prevent excessive rates and mitigate associated adverse outcomes.