Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT01:25

Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT

697
Calcium-Scoring CT ScanA calcium-scoring CT scan, also known as coronary artery calcium (CAC) scan, detects calcium deposits in the coronary arteries. This test assesses the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD), which can lead to cardiovascular events such as angina, heart failure, and sudden cardiac arrest.A calcium-scoring CT scan is generally recommended for individuals at intermediate risk of CAD without symptoms. It includes:Men aged 40-75 and women aged 50-75: Especially those with a...
697

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Conflicts of interest and interpretive authority in oncology.

European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)·2026
Same author

CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne·2026
Same author

Permission to exist.

CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne·2025
Same author

Conflict of Interest: Moving From Disclosure to Avoidance.

JCO oncology practice·2025
Same author

Rethinking prestige and dependency in global oncology.

Cancer·2025
Same author

Non-financial conflicts of interest.

Nature reviews. Clinical oncology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 14, 2026

Clinical Imaging of Microwave Mammography
05:28

Clinical Imaging of Microwave Mammography

Published on: November 14, 2025

371

Screening mammography: sparing the emperor's blushes.

Saroj Niraula1

  • 1Medical Oncology and Hematology, University of Manitoba and CancerCare Manitoba, 675 McDermot Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, R3E 0V9. sniraula@cancercare.mb.ca.

Cancer Medicine
|September 30, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Conflicting mammography screening recommendations exist due to differing evidence interpretations. Real and perceived benefits of screening mammography among women show a significant gap, warranting critical review of available information.

Keywords:
Breast cancermammographyoverdiagnosisovertreatmentscreening

More Related Videos

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

43.8K
MicroRNA Based Liquid Biopsy: The Experience of the Plasma miRNA Signature Classifier MSC for Lung Cancer Screening
08:14

MicroRNA Based Liquid Biopsy: The Experience of the Plasma miRNA Signature Classifier MSC for Lung Cancer Screening

Published on: October 26, 2017

16.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 14, 2026

Clinical Imaging of Microwave Mammography
05:28

Clinical Imaging of Microwave Mammography

Published on: November 14, 2025

371
Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

43.8K
MicroRNA Based Liquid Biopsy: The Experience of the Plasma miRNA Signature Classifier MSC for Lung Cancer Screening
08:14

MicroRNA Based Liquid Biopsy: The Experience of the Plasma miRNA Signature Classifier MSC for Lung Cancer Screening

Published on: October 26, 2017

16.3K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Screening
  • Public Health Policy
  • Evidence-Based Medicine

Background:

  • Conflicting recommendations on mammography screening arise from varied interpretations of evidence on benefits and harms.
  • Significant discrepancies exist between the actual and perceived benefits of mammography screening for women.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically analyze the concept of mammographic screening.
  • To evaluate limitations in primary evidence and results from secondary evidence.
  • To address existing misunderstandings regarding mammography screening.

Main Methods:

  • Critical review of scientific literature on mammography screening.
  • Analysis of primary and secondary evidence regarding screening benefits and harms.
  • Examination of media coverage and public perception of mammography.

Main Results:

  • Evidence interpretation varies, leading to divergent screening guidelines globally.
  • A notable gap exists between women's perceived benefits and the actual benefits of mammography screening.
  • Misunderstandings surrounding mammography screening are prevalent.

Conclusions:

  • There is a need for clearer communication and consistent interpretation of evidence for mammography screening.
  • Addressing the discrepancy between perceived and real benefits is crucial for informed decision-making.
  • Further critical evaluation of available data is necessary to refine screening guidelines.