Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2026

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
Published on: December 24, 2015
MMPI profiles of malingerers diagnosed in pretrial forensic evaluations
1Department of Mental Health, Mental Retardation and Substance Abuse Services Commonwealth of Virginia.
Abstract:
The MMPI has several indices associated with exaggeration of symptomatology, but they have seldom been researched with actual malingering subjects. Based upon interview behavior during pretrial forensic evaluations, samples of malingering (n = 18), psychotic (n = 17), and nonpsychotic (n = 36) criminal defendants were assembled for the present study. Both the malingerers and the psychotics either were untestable or produced incomplete or random MMPIs in about 50% of the cases. Comparisons of remaining profiles revealed significant differences between malingerers and other groups on several MMPI scales and F-K index. Discriminant analysis accurately classified malingerers and psychotics on the basis of MMPI variables. The MMPI may have considerable utility to detect malingering when subjects cooperate with testing.
Insights
The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) shows promise in detecting malingering among criminal defendants. When subjects cooperate, specific MMPI scales and the F-K index help differentiate genuine symptoms from feigned ones.
Area of Science:
- Forensic Psychology
- Clinical Psychology
- Psychometric Assessment
Background:
- The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) has indices for symptom exaggeration, but research with actual malingering subjects is limited.
- Forensic evaluations often involve assessing the credibility of defendants' self-reported symptoms.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the utility of the MMPI in detecting malingering in criminal defendants.
- To compare MMPI profiles of malingering, psychotic, and nonpsychotic individuals.
Main Methods:
- Assembled samples of malingering (n=18), psychotic (n=17), and nonpsychotic (n=36) criminal defendants based on interview behavior during pretrial evaluations.
- Administered the MMPI and analyzed profiles, noting untestable or invalid results.
- Utilized discriminant analysis to classify groups based on MMPI variables.
Main Results:
- Approximately 50% of malingering and psychotic subjects produced untestable or invalid MMPIs.
- Significant differences were found between malingerers and other groups on several MMPI scales and the F-K index.
- Discriminant analysis accurately classified malingerers and psychotics using MMPI data.
Conclusions:
- The MMPI can be a valuable tool for detecting malingering in forensic settings.
- Cooperation with MMPI testing is crucial for its effectiveness in identifying feigned symptomatology.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
Eyewitness Memory
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function like a...
False Memories
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information with...
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Strategies of Self-Presentation III: Self-Monitoring
Understanding Deception

