Related Concept Videos
Attachment Styles
Erikson's Theory on Socioemotional Development during Adolescence
Theory of Romantic Attachment in Adulthood
Hazan and Shaver's Attachment Styles
Unrealistic Optimism Bias
Uncertainty: Overview
You might also read
Related Articles
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
Flavonoid <i>O</i>-Methyltransferases in <i>Eucalyptus</i>-Biosynthesis of Alpinetin via a Methylated Chalcone Precursor.
Function of WAKs in Regulating Cell Wall Development and Responses to Abiotic Stress.
WALL-ASSOCIATED KINASE Like 14 regulates vascular tissue development in Arabidopsis and tomato.
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 14, 2026

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
Published on: September 16, 2015
An insecure future.
1Royal College of Nursing.
Nurses are protesting a 1.5% pay limit, viewing it as a real-terms salary reduction. They also dispute the notion of job security, which is increasingly uncertain for public sector nursing roles.
Area of Science:
- Healthcare Policy
- Public Sector Economics
Background:
- The UK Chancellor of the Exchequer proposed a 1.5% pay limit for public sector employees.
- This proposal was justified by the perceived job security of public sector workers.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the impact of the proposed pay limit on nursing salaries.
- To investigate the validity of the job security argument for nurses.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of the Autumn Statement's pay policy implications.
- Assessment of current job security trends for nurses in the public sector.
Main Results:
- Nurses face a real-terms reduction in salary due to the imposed pay limit.
- Evidence suggests that the job security previously enjoyed by nurses is diminishing.
Conclusions:
- The 1.5% pay limit is unacceptable to nurses, representing a pay cut.
- The justification of job security for limiting public sector pay is no longer accurate for the nursing profession.

