Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 14, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing Prostate Cancer Research Through Improved Tissue Sampling and Biobanking
Published on: November 17, 2023
Correlation between apparent diffusion coefficient value on diffusion-weighted MR imaging and Gleason score in
X Wu1, P Reinikainen2, A Vanhanen3
1Department of Oncology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Medical Imaging Centre, Department of Radiology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; School of Medicine, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.
Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and normalized ADC (nADC) can predict prostate cancer aggressiveness. Lower ADC and nADC values correlate with higher Gleason scores, aiding in differentiating tumor grades.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Oncology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Prostate cancer aggressiveness is crucial for treatment decisions.
- Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) provides insights into tissue microstructure.
- Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values may reflect tumor cellularity and aggressiveness.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if DWI apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) correlates with prostate cancer aggressiveness.
- To compare the diagnostic performance of ADC and normalized ADC (nADC) in assessing tumor aggressiveness.
- To evaluate ADC and nADC in differentiating between Gleason score 3+4 and 3+3 prostate tumors.
Main Methods:
- Thirty pre-treatment prostate cancer patients underwent MRI with DWI (b values: 50, 400, 800 s/mm²).
- ADC and nADC values (minimum and mean) were calculated for tumors.
- Correlations between ADC/nADC and Gleason scores from biopsy were analyzed.
Main Results:
- Tumor minimum ADC (ADCmin) inversely correlated with Gleason score (r=-0.43, P<0.05).
- ADCmin and nADC values were significantly lower in Gleason score 3+4 than 3+3 tumors (P<0.05).
- Normalized ADC metrics (nADCmin, nADCmean) showed strong correlations with Gleason score (r=-0.52, r=-0.55; P<0.01) and higher diagnostic performance (AUC 0.818-0.833).
Conclusions:
- Tumor ADCmin, nADCmin, and nADCmean are valuable biomarkers for predicting prostate cancer aggressiveness.
- Normalized ADC metrics demonstrate superior performance in differentiating between Gleason score 3+4 and 3+3 tumors.
- DWI-derived ADC and nADC metrics can aid in non-invasively assessing prostate cancer grade.
More Related Videos
06:08A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound
Published on: March 21, 2025
15:48Tracking the Mammary Architectural Features and Detecting Breast Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging
Published on: December 15, 2014