Mucosal Perforation During Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy Has No Influence on Final Treatment Outcome

Renato Salvador1, Lorenzo Spadotto1, Giovanni Capovilla1

  • 1Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

Abstract

Insights

Accidental mucosal perforation during laparoscopic Heller myotomy with Dor fundoplication (LHD) is rare and does not impact patient outcomes. Perforations do not alter surgeons' subsequent LHD approach.

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Surgical Innovation
  • Patient Safety

Background:

  • Laparoscopic Heller myotomy with Dor fundoplication (LHD) is a standard procedure for achalasia.
  • Intraoperative mucosal perforation is a potential complication during LHD.
  • Understanding the impact of perforations on outcomes and surgical practice is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the final outcomes in patients experiencing accidental mucosal perforation during LHD.
  • To determine if perforation events influence subsequent surgical approaches to LHD.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 875 consecutive LHD patients (1992-2015).
  • Patients divided into groups based on intraoperative mucosal perforation (group P) versus uneventful procedures (group NP).
  • Comparison of outcomes between patients operated immediately before (group A) and after (group B) a perforation event.

Main Results:

  • A mucosal perforation occurred in 2.9% of patients (25/875), unrelated to preoperative factors or surgeon experience.
  • Postoperative symptom scores and failure rates were similar between perforated (16%) and non-perforated (10.8%) groups (p=0.34).
  • Symptom recurrence rates were comparable in surgeons before (10%) and after (15%) a perforation (p=0.9).

Conclusions:

  • Accidental LHD perforation is infrequent, unpredictable, and does not affect long-term patient outcomes.
  • Despite longer procedures and hospital stays, outcomes remain comparable to uneventful LHD.
  • Perforation events do not alter surgeons' subsequent procedural performance or approach.

Related Concept Videos

Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management01:28

Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management

Esophageal perforations manifest in various clinical forms, influenced by factors such as the perforation's cause and location (cervical, intrathoracic, or intra-abdominal), the extent of contamination, and potential injury to adjacent mediastinal structures. The timing between the perforation occurrence and treatment initiation also affects the clinical presentation.
Clinical Manifestations:
893
Esophageal Perforation-I: Introduction01:22

Esophageal Perforation-I: Introduction

Esophageal perforation is a severe medical condition characterized by a breach in the integrity of the esophageal wall. This breach can occur due to various factors such as trauma, medical procedures, or underlying diseases. When the esophageal wall is compromised, it allows food, fluids, and digestive juices into the chest cavity or adjacent structures, leading to potential complications and health risks.
The location of esophageal perforation can vary, occurring anywhere along the esophagus....
713
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy01:26

Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy

Sigmoidoscopy and laparoscopy are distinct medical procedures that enable physicians to internally inspect different parts of the GI tract. Although they serve different purposes, each is essential for diagnosing and, in some cases, treating various medical conditions.
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
950