Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Validation of a standardized question and a numerical rating scale for assessment of patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty at one and two years.

Bone & joint open·2026
Same author

Missing not at random : how much missing patient-reported outcome measure data is too much?

The bone & joint journal·2026
Same author

Interesting data, but further corroborative studies are often needed.

The bone & joint journal·2026
Same author

Erratum.

The bone & joint journal·2026
Same author

Economic evaluation of robotic-assisted versus manual total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of cost and clinical outcomes.

EFORT open reviews·2026
Same author

Line-to-line cementation in hip arthroplasty : what is the current role of the 'French Paradox'?

The bone & joint journal·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 14, 2026

Author Spotlight: A Novel 3D-Printed Titanium Implant for Minimally Invasive Treatment of Hip Dysplasia in Young Dogs
08:40

Author Spotlight: A Novel 3D-Printed Titanium Implant for Minimally Invasive Treatment of Hip Dysplasia in Young Dogs

Published on: April 19, 2024

4.0K

Cementless hip implants: an expanding choice.

Dia Eldean Giebaly1, Haider Twaij2, Mazin Ibrahim3

  • 1University College London Hospital, London - UK.

Hip International : the Journal of Clinical and Experimental Research on Hip Pathology and Therapy
|October 1, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Cementless hip implants offer good long-term survival and function, especially in younger patients. Further research is needed to compare designs and determine optimal use based on patient factors.

More Related Videos

The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report
07:45

The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report

Published on: August 4, 2022

3.9K
Individualized Stem-positioning in Calcar-guided Short-stem Total Hip Arthroplasty
09:31

Individualized Stem-positioning in Calcar-guided Short-stem Total Hip Arthroplasty

Published on: February 27, 2018

12.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 14, 2026

Author Spotlight: A Novel 3D-Printed Titanium Implant for Minimally Invasive Treatment of Hip Dysplasia in Young Dogs
08:40

Author Spotlight: A Novel 3D-Printed Titanium Implant for Minimally Invasive Treatment of Hip Dysplasia in Young Dogs

Published on: April 19, 2024

4.0K
The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report
07:45

The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report

Published on: August 4, 2022

3.9K
Individualized Stem-positioning in Calcar-guided Short-stem Total Hip Arthroplasty
09:31

Individualized Stem-positioning in Calcar-guided Short-stem Total Hip Arthroplasty

Published on: February 27, 2018

12.6K

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Biomaterials Engineering

Background:

  • Total hip replacement (THR) is highly successful, with cementless implants evolving to address loosening issues common in cemented prostheses.
  • The ideal uncemented femoral stem aims for biomechanical restoration, pain-free function, and lifelong durability.
  • Achieving optimal results with cementless stems requires initial stability, osseointegration, biological fixation, and effective stress transfer to bone.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review current literature on cementless hip prostheses using evidence-based practice.
  • To discuss factors influencing cementless stem integration, stability, and fixation.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of current scientific publications.
  • Discussion of key factors including implant geometry, surface roughness, stem coating, surgical technique, and patient bone quality.

Main Results:

  • Uncemented femoral stems demonstrate good long-term survivorship and functional outcomes.
  • Promising results are noted particularly in younger patient populations.

Conclusions:

  • Biological fixation is the preferred method for cementless implants.
  • Limitations in current research hinder definitive comparisons between different stem designs and indications.
  • Future studies should incorporate patient age, activity level, bone type, and deformities for more conclusive findings on optimal cementless implant selection.