Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cohort Differences in Cognitive Aging in the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam.

Anamaria Brailean1, Martijn Huisman2, Martin Prince1

  • 1Department of Health Service and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Centre for Global Mental Health, King's College London, UK.

The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
|October 4, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Are socioeconomic, social and built neighbourhood characteristics associated with persistence of depression over 2 years?

Journal of affective disorders·2026
Same author

Late-career workforce participation in times of rising state pension age: the role of health and motivation.

BMC public health·2025
Same author

Two decades of end-of-life conditions of older adults: older and more protracted?

SSM - population health·2025
Same author

The Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam: design and cohort update 2025.

European journal of epidemiology·2025
Same author

The effect of sleep disturbances on the incidence of dementia for varying lag times.

The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease·2025
Same author

Affective Aspects of Religiousness and 6-Year Course of Depressive Symptoms in Aged Dutch Citizens.

International journal of aging & human development·2024

Later born cohorts demonstrated better initial cognitive function but not better long-term preservation. Education influenced early performance but not cognitive decline rates in aging individuals.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive neuroscience
  • Gerontology
  • Educational psychology

Background:

  • Cognitive aging varies across birth cohorts.
  • Education is a potential factor influencing cognitive performance and decline.
  • Understanding cohort effects is crucial for healthy cognitive aging research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare cognitive performance and decline rates between two birth cohorts (1920-1930 vs. 1931-1941).
  • To determine if educational attainment explains observed cohort differences in cognition.
  • To investigate cohort effects on episodic memory, processing speed, inductive reasoning, and general cognitive performance.

Main Methods:

  • Longitudinal study with two cohorts (N=705, N=646) aged 65-75 at baseline.
  • Follow-up assessments at 3 and 6 years.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Linear mixed models used for data analysis.

    • Main Results:

    • The later born cohort exhibited superior baseline performance in general cognition, inductive reasoning, and processing speed.
    • Cohort differences in inductive reasoning and general cognition were eliminated after adjusting for education.
    • The later born cohort experienced a faster decline in processing speed, while the earlier born cohort showed steeper memory decline.
    • Education did not account for cohort differences in the rate of cognitive decline.

    Conclusions:

    • Later born cohorts have better initial cognitive abilities but not better cognitive maintenance over time.
    • Educational attainment impacts initial cognitive performance but not the trajectory of cognitive aging.
    • Findings highlight the complex interplay of cohort, education, and cognitive aging, with implications for healthy cognitive aging strategies.