Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Influence of Earth's Curvature and Atmospheric Refraction on Leveling01:26

Influence of Earth's Curvature and Atmospheric Refraction on Leveling

1.1K
During leveling, the Earth's curvature and atmospheric refraction introduce deviations in the line of sight from a true horizontal reference. When the line of sight is leveled, it remains perpendicular to the plumb line only at a single point. Beyond this, it deviates due to the Earth’s curvature, represented by the correction C. For a sight distance D, the deviation can be derived using the relationship:This relationship shows that the deviation increases quadratically with distance. Over a...
1.1K
Focusing of Light in the Eye01:16

Focusing of Light in the Eye

7.0K
Light rays enter the eye through the cornea, a transparent dome-shaped tissue that is the eye's outermost layer. The cornea bends or refracts, light rays traveling to the pupil. The shape of the cornea determines how much of the light is bent and whether the image will be focused correctly on the retina at the back of the eye. Once the light has passed through both refraction layers, it converges into a single focal point onto a small area. This is where photoreceptors start transforming...
7.0K
Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

2.5K
Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
2.5K
Imaging Biological Samples with Optical Microscopy01:18

Imaging Biological Samples with Optical Microscopy

12.1K
Optical microscopy uses optic principles to provide detailed images of samples. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek designed the first compound optical microscope in the 17th century to visualize blood cells, bacteria, and yeast cells. In 1830, Joseph Jackson Lister created an essentially modern light microscope. The 20th century saw the development of microscopes with enhanced magnification and resolution.
In optical microscopy, the specimen to be viewed is placed on a glass slide and clipped on the stage...
12.1K
Mean Absolute Deviation01:13

Mean Absolute Deviation

3.6K
The mean absolute deviation is also a measure of the variability of data in a sample. It is the absolute value of the average difference between the data values and the mean.
Let us consider a dataset containing the number of unsold cupcakes in five shops: 10, 15, 8, 7, and 10. Initially, calculate the sample mean. Then calculate the deviation, or the difference, between each data value and the mean. Next, the absolute values of these deviations are added and divided by the sample size to...
3.6K
Perceptual Constancy01:12

Perceptual Constancy

1.7K
Perceptual constancy is the ability to recognize that objects remain consistent and unchanged even when their appearance varies due to changes in sensory input. There are four main types of perceptual constancy: size constancy, shape constancy, color constancy, and brightness constancy.
Size constancy is the recognition that an object remains the same size, even when its image on the retina changes. For instance, a bus is perceived to be large enough to carry people, even if it looks tiny from...
1.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reduced Image Quality Impairs Monocular Blur-Driven Accommodation in Keratoconus.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same author

Effect of spherical aberration on the vergence-accommodation conflict.

Biomedical optics express·2026
Same author

Comparison of decentration, tilt, and dynamic stability between retropupillary iris claw and scleral fixated intraocular lenses with flanged haptics.

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery·2026
Same author

Impact of Myopia Control Spectacles on Retinal Image Contrast.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same author

Optical quality and anisotropy across the retina of Chinese children's eyes.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision·2026
Same author

Stiles-Crawford effect in infrared two-photon vision.

Biomedical optics express·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 14, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Refractive Surgical Correction for Presbyopia and Exploring Postoperative Visual Acuity
05:46

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Refractive Surgical Correction for Presbyopia and Exploring Postoperative Visual Acuity

Published on: September 20, 2024

857

Minimum change in spherical aberration that can be perceived.

Silvestre Manzanera1, Pablo Artal1

  • 1Laboratorio de Óptica, Instituto Universitario de Investigación en Óptica y Nanofísica, Universidad de Murcia, Campus de Espinardo (Edificio 34), E-30100, Murcia Spain.

Biomedical Optics Express
|October 5, 2016
PubMed
Summary

This study quantifies visual sensitivity to optical blur from spherical aberration (SA). Findings establish thresholds for noticeable image quality differences, aiding ophthalmic applications and presbyopic solutions.

Keywords:
(330.4460) Ophthalmic optics and devices(330.7327) Visual optics, ophthalmic instrumentation

More Related Videos

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
05:14

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter

Published on: September 16, 2025

702
Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients
07:06

Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients

Published on: March 29, 2022

3.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 14, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Refractive Surgical Correction for Presbyopia and Exploring Postoperative Visual Acuity
05:46

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Refractive Surgical Correction for Presbyopia and Exploring Postoperative Visual Acuity

Published on: September 20, 2024

857
Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
05:14

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter

Published on: September 16, 2025

702
Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients
07:06

Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients

Published on: March 29, 2022

3.4K

Area of Science:

  • Optometry and Vision Science
  • Optical Engineering

Background:

  • Understanding visual sensitivity to optical blur is crucial for both basic science and practical ophthalmic applications.
  • Spherical aberration (SA) is of particular interest due to its use in increasing depth of focus for presbyopic correction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To measure the thresholds of spherical aberration that cause just-noticeable differences in perceived image quality.
  • To investigate these thresholds under various defocus conditions and for both positive and negative SA values.

Main Methods:

  • A flicker detection-based procedure was employed using an adaptive optics visual simulator.
  • Thresholds for positive and negative spherical aberration were measured at best focus, +0.5 D, and +1.0 D of defocus.

Main Results:

  • At best focus, the spherical aberration thresholds were 0.20 ± 0.01 µm for positive SA and -0.17 ± 0.03 µm for negative SA (6-mm pupil).
  • Thresholds varied with defocus, indicating differing sensitivities to SA under different visual conditions.

Conclusions:

  • The determined spherical aberration thresholds provide quantitative data on visual sensitivity to blur.
  • These experimental values can inform the setting of permissible spherical aberration levels in ophthalmic techniques and presbyopic correction strategies.