Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Subliminal Perception01:15

Subliminal Perception

954
Subliminal perception refers to the processing of sensory information that occurs below the level of conscious awareness. Researchers study subliminal perception by presenting a stimulus, such as a word or image, very quickly, typically around 50 milliseconds. This rapid presentation is often followed by another stimulus, such as a pattern of dots or lines, which blocks further mental processing of the initial stimulus. As a result, if participants cannot identify the initial stimulus better...
954
Masking and Demasking Agents01:19

Masking and Demasking Agents

3.9K
EDTA titrations may necessitate masking and demasking agents to temporarily protect a particular metal ion in a mixture from the EDTA reaction. These agents facilitate the sequential analysis of the metal ions by forming stable complexes with some—but not all—metal ions during certain steps.
There are many masking agents, such as cyanide, fluoride, triethanolamine, thiourea, and 2,3-bis(sulfanyl)propan-1-ol (formerly 2,3-dimercapto-1-propanol), with the masking agent chosen based on...
3.9K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.7K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Single-nuclei UPR profiling by flow cytometry reveals bortezomib resistance mechanisms in multiple myeloma.

EMBO molecular medicine·2026
Same author

Individual differences reveal distinct age-related reorganizations in spatial channels for luminance and texture processing.

npj aging·2026
Same author

The amblyopic acuity deficit: Identification of letters distorted by spatial scrambling algorithms.

Vision research·2026
Same author

Development of a novel dichoptic reading tool to improve vision in amblyopia.

Vision research·2026
Same author

Regaining Visual Acuity Does Not Restore Motion Extrapolation Deficits in Amblyopia.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2025
Same author

Dynamic Stereopsis Is Abnormal in Treated Anisometropic Amblyopia.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2025
Same journal

Impact of Subretinal Drusenoid Deposits on Ellipsoid Zone-Related Thickness Metrics.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same journal

Proteomic Profiling of Optic Nerves From SMOX-Deficient Mice Identifies Regulators of Neuroinflammation and Axonal Damage in Optic Neuritis.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same journal

Aflibercept and Faricimab Equipotently Restore Endothelial Barrier Function.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same journal

Spatial Decomposition of Longitudinal RNFL Maps Reveals Distinct Modes of Glaucomatous Progression With Structure-Function and Genetic Signatures.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same journal

The CXXC1-IGFBP6 Axis Maintains Corneal Epithelial Differentiation via H3K4me3-Dependent Transcriptional Activation.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same journal

Archetypal Visual Field Analysis of Patients With Chronic Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy in Relation to Visual Recovery.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 14, 2026

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms
08:05

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms

Published on: February 10, 2016

6.8K

Is Suppression Just Normal Dichoptic Masking? Suprathreshold Considerations.

Alexandre Reynaud1, Robert F Hess1

  • 1McGill Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.

Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
|October 5, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Amblyopic suppression stems from reduced contrast perception, not typical masking, suggesting an attenuated visual input. This finding impacts understanding of amblyopia treatment strategies.

More Related Videos

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry
14:34

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry

Published on: November 10, 2010

77.0K
The Measurement and Treatment of Suppression in Amblyopia
08:34

The Measurement and Treatment of Suppression in Amblyopia

Published on: December 14, 2012

50.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 14, 2026

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms
08:05

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms

Published on: February 10, 2016

6.8K
How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry
14:34

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry

Published on: November 10, 2010

77.0K
The Measurement and Treatment of Suppression in Amblyopia
08:34

The Measurement and Treatment of Suppression in Amblyopia

Published on: December 14, 2012

50.7K

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Neuroscience
  • Vision Science

Background:

  • Amblyopia, or 'lazy eye,' causes reduced visual acuity and contrast sensitivity.
  • Suppression of the amblyopic eye's input occurs during binocular viewing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the origin of amblyopic suppression.
  • To assess contrast perception in the amblyopic eye at suprathreshold levels under binocular and monocular viewing.

Main Methods:

  • Employed a suprathreshold contrast matching task with stimuli presented to different eyes.
  • Measured interocular contrast matching in 10 controls and 11 amblyopes.
  • Compared binocular balance across spatial frequencies with contrast sensitivity ratios.

Main Results:

  • Amblyopes showed imbalanced binocular matching at high spatial frequencies compared to controls.
  • This imbalance was independent of stimulus presentation timing (simultaneous/successive).
  • Matching balance strongly correlated with interocular contrast sensitivity ratios (R = 0.7125).

Conclusions:

  • Amblyopic suppression involves comparable losses in contrast perception at and above threshold.
  • Findings suggest amblyopic suppression is due to input attenuation, not dichoptic masking.
  • Monocular contrast sensitivity effectively predicted matching contrast levels.