Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 14, 2026

Upper-extremity Approach for Secondary Access in Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Published on: August 8, 2025
Transaxillary versus transaortic approach for transcatheter aortic valve implantation with CoreValve Revalving
Claudia Fiorina1, Giuseppe Bruschi2, Luca Testa3
1Spedali Civili Brescia, Brescia, Italy - clafiorina@yahoo.it.
Insights
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) via the transaortic (TAo) route offers similar device success and safety compared to the transaxillary (TAx) approach. However, TAo TAVI requires specialized care due to increased risks like acute kidney injury and longer hospital stays.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Surgical Innovation
Background:
- Severe peripheral artery disease complicates standard femoral access for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).
- Alternative TAVI access routes, including transaxillary (TAx) and transaortic (TAo), are crucial for patients unsuitable for femoral approaches.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the outcomes of TAVI using the Medtronic CoreValve Revalving System (CRS) via the TAx versus the TAo approach.
- To evaluate device success, safety, and complication rates between TAx and TAo TAVI procedures.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of 242 consecutive TAVI procedures using Medtronic CoreValve Revalving System (CRS) across four Italian centers.
- Patients were treated via either the TAx (61%) or TAo (39%) route.
Main Results:
- Device success rates were comparable between TAx and TAo TAVI (P=0.16).
- The TAo route showed a trend towards lower rates of significant paravalvular leak (6% vs. 14%, P=0.07) and significantly reduced permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation (13% vs. 34%, P=0.017).
- Conversely, the TAo approach was associated with a higher incidence of acute kidney injury (P=0.016) and longer hospital stays (10 days vs. 8 days, P=0.001).
Conclusions:
- The TAo approach demonstrates comparable device success, 30-day safety, and 1-year efficacy to the TAx route for TAVI, despite a higher baseline risk profile.
- Non-procedure-specific complications post-TAo TAVI necessitate specialized postoperative care.
- Treatment with the TAo approach should be reserved for highly specialized and experienced centers.
Background:
About one-third of candidates for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) suffer from severe peripheral artery disease, making the routine femoral approach difficult or impossible. The aim was to compare the transaxillary (TAx) and the transaortic (TAo) route for TAVI with Medtronic CoreValve Revalving System (CRS).
Methods:
Out of 1049 consecutive TAVI with 18F CRS, 242 (23%) were treated in 4 high-volume Italian Centre through TAx (61%) and TAo (39%).
Results:
The devices success was similar (P=0.16) with a trend to a lower incidence of significant paravalvular leak (6% vs. 14%, P=0.07) and a significant reduction of permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation (13% vs. 34%, P=0.017) in the TAo. However, this route showed a higher incidence of acute kidney injury (P=0.016) and a longer hospital stay after the index procedure (days 10 [8-14] vs. 8 [7-12], P=0.001). By a multivariate analysis the vascular access is an independent predictor for a longer hospital stay (TAo route; OR=0.37, 95% CI: 0.18-0.75; P=0.006) and for PPM implantation (TAx route; OR=3.7, 95% CI: 1.2-10.8; P=0.017).
Conclusions:
Although the higher clinical risk profile of transaortic population, the TAo approach showed an equally high device success with similar 30-day safety and 1year efficacy, compared to TAx route. However, due to non-procedure-specific complications post-TAo TAVI, this route requires a specialized postoperative care and the treatment of patients in highly specialized and experienced centers.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Aortic Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management

