Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 14, 2026

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
Published on: July 8, 2025
pyDock scoring for the new modeling challenges in docking: Protein-peptide, homo-multimers, and domain-domain
Chiara Pallara1, Brian Jiménez-García1, Miguel Romero1
1Life Sciences Department, Joint BSC-CRG-IRB Research Program in Computational Biology, Barcelona Supercomputing Center, Barcelona, Spain.
Abstract:
The sixth CAPRI edition included new modeling challenges, such as the prediction of protein-peptide complexes, and the modeling of homo-oligomers and domain-domain interactions as part of the first joint CASP-CAPRI experiment. Other non-standard targets included the prediction of interfacial water positions and the modeling of the interactions between proteins and nucleic acids. We have participated in all proposed targets of this CAPRI edition both as predictors and as scorers, with new protocols to efficiently use our docking and scoring scheme pyDock in a large variety of scenarios. In addition, we have participated for the first time in the servers section, with our recently developed webserver, pyDockWeb. Excluding the CASP-CAPRI cases, we submitted acceptable models (or better) for 7 out of the 18 evaluated targets as predictors, 4 out of the 11 targets as scorers, and 6 out of the 18 targets as servers. The overall success rates were below those in past CAPRI editions. This shows the challenging nature of this last edition, with many difficult targets for which no participant submitted a single acceptable model. Interestingly, we submitted acceptable models for 83% of the evaluated protein-peptide targets. As for the 25 cases of the CASP-CAPRI experiment, in which we used a larger variety of modeling techniques (template-based, symmetry restraints, literature information, etc.), we submitted acceptable models for 56% of the targets. In summary, this CAPRI edition showed that pyDock scheme can be efficiently adapted to the increasing variety of problems that the protein interactions field is currently facing. Proteins 2017; 85:487-496. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
More Related Videos
08:49Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis
Published on: June 20, 2025
06:50Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
Published on: January 26, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Protein-protein Interfaces
Protein-Protein Interfaces
Ligand Binding Sites
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
Ligand Binding Sites
Conserved Binding Sites
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
Protein Complexes with Interchangeable Parts