Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

9.2K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
9.2K
Blinding01:11

Blinding

4.0K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
4.0K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

11.0K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
11.0K
Blind Procedures02:07

Blind Procedures

13.8K
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...
13.8K
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

349
Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...
349
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

519
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
519

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Designing sexual health services for young people: a methodology for capturing the user voice.

Health & social care in the community·2009
Same author

A Q methodology study of women's experience of enduring postnatal perineal and pelvic floor morbidity.

Midwifery·2006
Same author

The training and development needs of nurses in Indonesia: paper 3 of 3.

Human resources for health·2006
Same author

A methodology for assessing the professional development needs of nurses and midwives in Indonesia: paper 1 of 3.

Human resources for health·2006
Same author

The training and development needs of midwives in Indonesia: paper 2 of 3.

Human resources for health·2006
Same author

Perceptions of the learning environment in higher specialist training of doctors: implications for recruitment and retention.

Medical education·2006
Same journal

Using photo elicitation in focused ethnography with adolescents: methodological lessons from an urban greenspace study.

Nurse researcher·2026
Same journal

Adapting interpretative phenomenological analysis: a multilayered perspectival design for health research.

Nurse researcher·2026
Same journal

An art-based mixed-methods study exploring children's environmental preferences in home-based nursing research.

Nurse researcher·2026
Same journal

Using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis in clinical nursing research.

Nurse researcher·2026
Same journal

Integrating the experience sampling method and intersectionality to capture lived realities in nursing research.

Nurse researcher·2026
Same journal

Fraudulent qualitative study participants: experiences of two nurse researchers.

Nurse researcher·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 14, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
04:53

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

11.4K

The randomised controlled trial: a critique.

Carolyn Hicks1

  • 1School of Continuing Studies, University of Birmingham.

Nurse Researcher
|October 6, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Healthcare practices often rely on tradition rather than evidence, leading to ineffective treatments and missed opportunities for better patient outcomes. This highlights significant variations in medical practice and patient care.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Impact of Reduced Resistance Exercise Volume on Metabolic Health
06:13

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Impact of Reduced Resistance Exercise Volume on Metabolic Health

Published on: December 1, 2023

1.8K
Author Spotlight: Methodologies and Advancements of Chronic Pain Management Research
08:33

Author Spotlight: Methodologies and Advancements of Chronic Pain Management Research

Published on: January 5, 2024

1.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 14, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
04:53

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

11.4K
Author Spotlight: Exploring the Impact of Reduced Resistance Exercise Volume on Metabolic Health
06:13

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Impact of Reduced Resistance Exercise Volume on Metabolic Health

Published on: December 1, 2023

1.8K
Author Spotlight: Methodologies and Advancements of Chronic Pain Management Research
08:33

Author Spotlight: Methodologies and Advancements of Chronic Pain Management Research

Published on: January 5, 2024

1.9K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Practice and Healthcare Delivery

Background:

  • Healthcare decisions traditionally influenced by historical practices, personal preferences, and ritual.
  • Persistence of ineffective clinical interventions in current medical practice.
  • Failure to adopt interventions with known positive outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the impact of traditional practices on current healthcare delivery.
  • To identify reasons for the variation in clinical interventions and treatment outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Review of historical and current healthcare practices.
  • Analysis of clinical intervention adoption rates.
  • Assessment of treatment outcome data.

Main Results:

  • Significant variations in medical practice are evident.
  • Ineffective treatments continue to be used.
  • Evidence-based interventions with good outcomes are underutilized.

Conclusions:

  • Healthcare delivery is significantly impacted by non-evidence-based practices.
  • There is a critical need to bridge the gap between established evidence and clinical practice.
  • Addressing these variations is essential for improving patient outcomes.