Positive Behavioral Interventions and Support as Behavior Analysis in Practice: Why Is This Even Controversial?

Area of Science:

• Behavioral Science
• Education
• Psychology

Background:

• Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) is often debated within the applied behavior analysis (ABA) community.
• Key areas of contention include measurement methodologies, the use of aversive control, and the specific targets of behavioral interventions.

Purpose of the Study:

• To critically examine the controversies surrounding PBIS within the broader field of ABA.
• To analyze the specific points of contention: measurement, aversive control, and treatment targets.
• To evaluate these issues in the context of Horner and Sugai's work and the current state of ABA.

Main Methods:

• Literature review and critical analysis of existing research and theoretical positions.
• Discussion of measurement issues in behavioral interventions.
• Examination of the role and perception of aversive control in behavior modification.

Main Results:

• The paper identifies measurement, aversive control, and treatment targets as primary sources of controversy.
• Analysis suggests that the ongoing debate may stem from differing interpretations and applications within ABA.

Conclusions:

• The persistent controversy surrounding PBIS in ABA warrants further investigation.
• The authors question the necessity of the ongoing debate, suggesting a need for clearer consensus or understanding within the field.